Tue, 18 Aug 2026 · LIVE
Updated Aug 14, 2026 · 18:35
Education News Updated Aug 14, 2026

DU Drops Long-Running History Papers from New PG Syllabus

Delhi University has removed several long-running History papers from its newly notified Semester III postgraduate syllabus, including a core paper on the Delhi Sultanate. Other omitted papers cover ancient Indian gender history, political processes, and religious traditions. The History Department had proposed 38 Discipline Specific Elective papers, but only 16 were included in the final notification. Faculty members have expressed concerns over the reduced range of specialised courses available to students.

DU drops several long-running History papers from newly notified Semester III PG syllabus

New Delhi, August 14

The University of Delhi has dropped several long-running papers from the newly notified Semester III postgraduate History syllabus, including a paper on the Delhi Sultanate that had been taught as a core Medieval India paper for several decades, sources in the university's History Department told.

The most notable omission is The Delhi Sultanate: Structures of Authority in Medieval North India (13th-14th Centuries). The paper focused on the formation of the medieval state, structures of authority, political power and religious and cultural developments in medieval North India.

According to sources in the History Department, several other long-running papers have also not been included in the newly notified syllabus.

Professor K. Ratnabali, Dean of Academic Affairs, did not respond to ANI calls seeking a response on the reasons behind the omissions. These include History of North India, c. 1400-1550, Gender and Women in Early India: 1500 BCE to 1000 CE, Political Processes and Structure of Polities in Ancient India, and Religion and Society in Ancient Indian Literature.

Sources said the History Department had proposed 38 Discipline Specific Elective (DSE) papers for Semester III. However, only 16 DSE papers were included in the final syllabus notification, leaving several of the proposed papers out.

The omitted papers cover major themes and periods in Indian history, including medieval political structures, gender and social history in ancient India, political formations and religious traditions.

The Delhi Sultanate paper, in particular, dealt with the emergence and consolidation of political authority in medieval North India and examined the structures through which the Sultanate state exercised power.

A source in the History Department said the reduction in the number of DSE options has raised concerns among faculty members over the range of specialised courses available to postgraduate students.

The university is currently restructuring its postgraduate programmes under the National Education Policy framework, with changes being made to course structures and paper offerings.

— ANI

Reader Comments

Priya S

Why reduce DSE options from 38 to 16? Students should have the freedom to specialize in areas they are passionate about, be it ancient gender studies or medieval political structures. This seems like a step backward for higher education in India.

James A

I'm an international student studying in Delhi, and I find this surprising. The Delhi Sultanate period is crucial for understanding the subcontinent's history. I hope the department reconsiders, as this impacts not just Indian students but also those from abroad.

Vikram M

Respectfully, this is a misguided move. History isn't just about dates and events; it's about understanding our collective past, which includes the Sultanate's complex governance. Reducing these papers might be an administrative shortcut, but academically, it's a disservice to students.

Rahul R

It's disheartening to see 'Gender and Women in Early India' being dropped. That paper gave a voice to women's history, which is often overlooked. I hope the faculty voices are heard and these papers are restored.

Sneha F

I get that NEP is restructuring things, but silently cutting critical papers without any proper explanation is not transparent. The Dean's silence on this issue says a lot. Faculty and students deserve clarity.

Kavya N

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked