Nepal's Prachanda Vows Diplomacy, International Law for India Border Fix

The Nepali Communist Party, led by former Prime Minister Prachanda, has pledged to settle the longstanding border disputes with India over Lipulekh, Limpiyadhura, and Kalapani through diplomatic dialogue and international law. The commitment comes in a policy paper ahead of March elections, highlighting the dispute as a key bilateral irritant that escalated in 2020. The party also vows to review perceived unequal treaties, like the 1950 India-Nepal pact, and pursue a balanced, non-aligned foreign policy prioritizing national sovereignty. On the domestic front, it promises a powerful anti-corruption commission to investigate public officials and address public anger over graft.

Key Points: Nepal's Prachanda Pledges Diplomatic Border Solution with India

  • Resolve border dispute via diplomacy & law
  • Review "unequal" treaties with India
  • Strengthen non-aligned foreign policy
  • Form powerful anti-corruption commission
3 min read

Diplomacy, international law to resolve border dispute with India: Former Nepal PM Prachanda

Former Nepal PM Prachanda commits to resolving the Kalapani border dispute with India through dialogue and international law ahead of elections.

"The disputes over Lipulekh, Limpiyadhura, and Kalapani would be resolved through diplomatic talks and in accordance with international law. - Pushpa Kamal Dahal 'Prachanda'"

Kathmandu, Feb 10

The Nepali Communist Party, led by former Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal 'Prachanda', has vowed to work toward settling the border dispute with India through diplomatic dialogue and international law.

Unveiling the party's commitment paper ahead of the March 5 elections on Tuesday, party coordinator Dahal said the disputes over Lipulekh, Limpiyadhura, and Kalapani would be resolved through diplomatic talks and in accordance with international law.

Both Nepal and India claim the territory along Nepal's northwestern border as their own, although it has remained under India's effective control. Both countries have incorporated the areas into their official political maps.

Relations between the two countries deteriorated sharply when the government led by former Prime Minister K P Sharma Oli issued Nepal's new political map in 2020 by incorporating these disputed territories, and Nepal's parliament amended the constitution accordingly. The border dispute has long remained one of the key irritants in bilateral relations.

The Nepali Communist Party, formed after the merger of the erstwhile Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre) and the CPN (Unified Socialist), along with several fringe leftist parties, also pledged to modernise border points with neighbouring countries. Nepal shares borders with India to the east, south, and west, and with China to the north.

The commitment paper further states that Nepal will maintain an active and robust presence in multilateral forums, including the United Nations, the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), and the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC).

The NCP has expressed its commitment to strengthening Nepal's non-aligned foreign policy, giving the highest priority to national interest, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.

The party announced a policy of developing balanced relations based on mutual respect, trust, and benefit, while prioritising ties with neighbouring countries. The document highlights the need to review perceived unequal treaties and agreements and conclude new ones based on mutual benefit. Nepal's leftist parties have long criticized the 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship between Nepal and India as unequal, calling for its amendment or annulment.

The commitment paper also emphasises economic diplomacy to promote foreign investment, export growth, technology transfer, tourism, and employment opportunities.

It further underscores the strengthening of Nepal's voice in international forums on climate change, Himalayan conservation, mountain-related concerns, and the shared interests of landlocked countries. It also commits to formulating policies and institutional mechanisms to harness the skills, capital, experience, and expertise of non-resident Nepalis for national development.

On the domestic front, the party pledged to control corruption, noting that public anger, particularly among Gen-Z, over corruption led to the downfall of the previous government led by former Prime Minister Oli in September last year.

"A powerful and independent commission will be formed, with a one-year mandate, to investigate the assets of all individuals who have held public office and to probe corruption scandals," the party said. "A high-level, empowered Lokpal (ombudsman) will also be established by integrating bodies such as the Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority, the National Vigilance Center, and the Department of Money Laundering Investigation to curb corruption across all state institutions and bring offenders to justice."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While dialogue is good, we must be very clear and firm on our territorial integrity. Kalapani is and has been an integral part of India. Historical maps and facts support this. Hope Nepal's leadership engages with this reality.
R
Rohit P
The focus on economic diplomacy and fighting corruption in Nepal is actually a positive sign. A stable, prosperous Nepal is good for the entire region. Maybe solving the border issue can unlock more trade and connectivity projects? 🤔
S
Sarah B
International law is a double-edged sword. India should also be prepared to present its case robustly if it goes that route. But honestly, as a citizen, I wish our leaders would prioritize resolving this. It's been hanging for too long.
V
Vikram M
The mention of reviewing "unequal treaties" is concerning. The 1950 treaty has facilitated an open border that benefits millions of people on both sides. Any change must be carefully considered so ordinary people don't suffer.
K
Karthik V
With respect, I think our media and government need to do a better job of communicating the facts of this issue to the public. There's a lot of confusion. A calm, fact-based public discourse would help support our diplomats.
M
Michael C
Prach

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50