Devotees Pray at Bhojshala Complex After Historic MP High Court Verdict

Devotees offered prayers at the Bhojshala complex in Dhar after the MP High Court declared it a temple and granted Hindu worship rights. The court designated the site a protected monument under ASI control, modifying the previous order that allowed Muslim prayers on Fridays. Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain called the verdict historic, noting the court recognized the complex as belonging to Raja Bhoj. Two caveat pleas have been filed in the Supreme Court anticipating a challenge from the Muslim side.

Key Points: Bhojshala Complex: HC Grants Hindu Worship Rights

  • MP High Court declares Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex a temple
  • Hindu side granted right to worship at the site
  • ASI retains control as protected monument
  • Previous ASI order allowing Friday Namaz modified
  • Caveat pleas filed in Supreme Court
3 min read

Devotees offer prayers at Bhojshala complex in Dhar after Madhya Pradesh HC's verdict

MP High Court declares Bhojshala complex a temple, grants Hindu side worship rights. Devotees offer prayers in Dhar after historic verdict.

"After years, we got the chance to have darshan without any obstacle. The court gave a great verdict. - Devotee"

Dhar, May 16

Devotees entered the Bhojshala complex in Dhar district on Saturday to offer prayers after the Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court declared the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex a temple and granted the Hindu side the right to worship at the site.

A few devotees gathered and offered prayers inside the premises today following the court's order.

A devotee welcomed the verdict and said they were now able to offer prayers without restrictions.

"After years, we got the chance to have darshan without any obstacle. The court gave a great verdict. I will come here every day to offer prayers," the devotee told the reporters.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Friday delivered a verdict, granting the Hindu side the right to worship and recognising the complex as belonging to Raja Bhoj.

ASI Lawyer Aviral Vikas Khare highlighted the legal framework of the decision, stating, "The key highlights of this order are that the Bhojshala site has been designated as a 'Protected Monument,' a status it has held since the year 1904. This implies that the entire administration and regulation of this monument shall remain exclusively with the ASI (Archaeological Survey of India); in essence, the supervision of this site will rest solely with the ASI."

The court ruled that the disputed site is fundamentally a temple dedicated to Goddess Vagdevi, dating back to the Bhoj-Parmar dynasty, and overturned the previous ASI order.

"The court determined the character of the site, affirming that it was historically the location of a temple dedicated to Vagdevi (Goddess Saraswati) and that it was constructed during the era of the Bhoj/Parmar dynasty. Based on this determination of its character, the Hindu community has been granted the right to offer worship at the site. Additionally, the ASI's previous order--which had granted the Muslim community permission to offer 'Namaz' (prayers) on Fridays for a specific duration--has been modified. The complex itself will remain under the custody of the ASI," he said.

Addressing media personnel after the MP High Court's order, Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side, termed the judgment as "historic," noting that the court has partially set aside the Archaeological Survey of India's (ASI) order dated April 7, 2003.

"The Indore High Court has delivered a historic verdict, partially setting aside the ASI's order dated April 7, 2003. Furthermore, the Court has granted the Hindu side the right to worship and has recognised the Bhojshala complex as belonging to Raja Bhoj," Jain said.

The advocate further revealed that the court addressed the demand for the repatriation of the idol, which is currently housed in a museum in London.

Meanwhile, two caveat pleas have been moved in the Supreme Court hours after the Madhya Pradesh High Court declared the disputed complex a temple, anticipating that parties from the Muslim side may challenge the verdict before the apex court.

Pending adjudication, the State authorities had put in place a shared arrangement for religious practices while the site remained under the supervision of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), which had also surveyed the complex.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who follows Indian history from abroad, this is fascinating. The court's reasoning about the Vagdevi temple dating back to the Bhoj-Parmar dynasty seems thorough. But I worry about communal tensions—hope both communities can coexist peacefully.
V
Vikram M
Justice at last! The ASI's 2003 order was a compromise that pleased nobody. Now Hindus can finally pray without restrictions. But I must say, the repatriation of the idol from London is equally important—that Saraswati idol belongs in India, not in a foreign museum. 🙏
M
Michael C
I'm curious about the legal basis. The court said it's a protected monument under ASI control, but also a temple. How does worship work under ASI rules? Seems like a delicate balance. Still, a well-reasoned judgment considering historical evidence.
P
Priya S
This is wonderful news for devotees! 🪔 But I have mixed feelings. While I'm happy for the Hindu community, I also feel for the Muslim side who used to offer namaz there. Both communities have historical connections to this place. Let's hope the Supreme Court handles the caveat petitions wisely.
R
Rohit P
Bhagwan ka bahut bada din hai! 🙏 Finally our ancestors' prayers have been answered. The Bhojshala complex should never have been shared in the first place—it was built as a temple, and now it's restored to its rightful purpose. I applaud the judiciary for this courageous decision.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50