Delhi HC Questions DGCA's Decision to Delay Pilot Fatigue Safety Rules

The Delhi High Court has sought the DGCA's stance on its decision to keep revised Flight Duty Time Limitation regulations in abeyance until 2026. The court emphasized that safety regulations must be enforced unless legally flawed, noting their direct link to passenger safety. The petition, filed by a former aircraft engineer and others, argues that delaying the rules compromises safety and undermines international standards. The DGCA had paused the norms following operational difficulties and widespread flight cancellations at airlines like IndiGo.

Key Points: Delhi HC Seeks DGCA Stand on Delayed Pilot Fatigue Rules

  • Court questions safety rule delay
  • Revised FDTL norms aim to reduce pilot fatigue
  • Petition filed by ex-aircraft engineer and CRM trainer
  • DGCA paused rules after IndiGo flight disruptions
  • Rules align with international safety standards
3 min read

Delhi HC seeks DGCA's stand on keeping FDTL rules in abeyance

Delhi High Court questions DGCA's move to keep revised Flight Duty Time Limitation rules on hold, emphasizing passenger safety concerns.

"Unless the regulations are challenged or have an inherent flaw, they have to be enforced. - Delhi High Court Bench"

New Delhi, January 28

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought the stand of the Directorate General of Civil Aviation on a plea challenging its decision to keep the revised Flight Duty Time Limitation regulations in abeyance, despite their direct link to passenger safety.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia observed that once safety regulations are framed, they must be enforced unless they suffer from legal infirmities or are successfully challenged.

"Unless the regulations are challenged or have an inherent flaw, they have to be enforced. These regulations have a direct nexus with safety measures. The concern raised in this petition cannot be brushed aside," the Bench orally remarked.

The Court was hearing a petition filed by Sabari Roy, a former aircraft engineer, along with Aman Monga and Kiran Singh. Roy has strong technical expertise and extensive hands-on experience in aircraft maintenance and operations. Monga is an experienced Crew Resource Management (CRM) trainer, while Singh is a social worker. The petitioners have questioned the DGCA's decision to pause the implementation of the revised FDTL norms till February 10, 2026.

The FDTL regulations prescribe minimum rest periods for pilots and flight crew members and aim to strengthen fatigue management to ensure passenger safety.

The DGCA had put the norms on hold following widespread flight disruptions, particularly after operational difficulties at IndiGo, which led to large-scale flight cancellations in late 2025.

During the hearing, the respondent raised objections to Roy's locus standi, pointing out that a separate petition concerning the same FDTL norms, filed by pilots' associations, is already pending before a Single Judge of the High Court.

However, the Division Bench was not inclined to reject the petition at the threshold. It noted that Roy's professional background as an aircraft engineer directly connects her role with aviation and passenger safety.

"She has worked as an aircraft engineer. Her functions are directly connected with passenger safety. Her locus cannot be ruled out outrightly," the Court observed, adding that the pendency of a similar plea before a Single Judge would not bar others from raising public interest concerns.

"It is a matter of public interest. A plea before a Single Judge will not debar others from approaching the Court," the judges said.

The Court thereafter directed Advocate Anjana Gosain, appearing virtually for the DGCA, to seek instructions and place the aviation regulator's stand before the Court on January 29.

The petition highlights that the revised FDTL regulations were notified to align Indian aviation safety standards with international norms prescribed by the International Civil Aviation Organisation and to reduce pilot fatigue. It contends that keeping the norms in abeyance compromises passenger safety and undermines the very objective for which the regulations were framed.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As a frequent flyer, this is very concerning. We trust airlines with our lives. If pilots are fatigued, how can we feel safe? The DGCA's decision to delay these norms till 2026 seems like a knee-jerk reaction to IndiGo's problems. The entire industry shouldn't suffer.
A
Arjun K
Respectfully, while safety is paramount, the court must also consider the practical reality. The aviation sector is still recovering. Sudden strict rules can lead to massive flight cancellations, hurting the common traveler. A phased implementation might be more sensible.
P
Priya S
Kudos to Sabari Roy and the petitioners! It takes guts to take on the DGCA. Her technical expertise gives the petition real weight. The court's point about public interest is spot on - this affects every single person who boards a flight.
M
Michael C
This is a classic case of regulatory capture. The DGCA is supposed to regulate the airlines, not accommodate their failures. Keeping safety norms "in abeyance" for over a year is unacceptable. The High Court needs to ensure they are enforced without delay.
K
Kavya N
Pilot fatigue is a serious issue, yaar. We've all read those scary stories about pilots falling asleep. Aligning with international norms (ICAO) is the right thing to do. Why is India always lagging behind on safety standards? We deserve better.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50