South Korea-US Defence Chiefs Discuss OPCON Transfer and Hormuz Ship Blast

South Korean Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back meets US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth in Washington to discuss wartime operational control (OPCON) transfer. The talks also address Seoul's push for nuclear-powered submarines and the recent explosion on a South Korean cargo ship in the Strait of Hormuz. Differing views on the OPCON timeline emerge, with US Forces Korea commander suggesting a 2029 deadline. South Korea reviews participation in the US-led Maritime Freedom Construct amid rising tensions in the Middle East.

Key Points: South Korea-US Defence Talks on OPCON, Submarines

  • OPCON transfer timeline discussed amid differing views
  • South Korea seeks nuclear-powered submarine deal
  • Hormuz ship blast raises security concerns
  • Seoul reviews US-led Maritime Freedom Construct
3 min read

Defence chiefs of South Korea, US set to hold talks amid OPCON transfer push, Hormuz ship issue

South Korean and US defence chiefs meet to discuss OPCON transfer timeline, nuclear-powered submarines, and the Strait of Hormuz ship explosion.

"all possible measures to prevent a recurrence of incidents like the case of the HMM Namu cargo ship - Seoul officials"

Washington, May 11

The top defence chiefs of South Korea and the United States are set to hold talks in Washington on Monday, focusing on advancing the transfer of wartime operational control from Washington to Seoul and Korea's push to acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back will meet US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to discuss follow-up steps on the OPCON transition and nuclear-powered submarines, in line with the agreements reached between the leaders and at high-level security talks last year, Seoul officials said.

The upcoming talks also come a day after South Korea determined a strike by two unidentified flying objects was behind the May 4 explosion and fire on a South Korean-operated cargo vessel in the Strait of Hormuz. The issue could be raised in Monday's talks, reports Yonhap news agency.

South Korea is seeking to retake wartime OPCON before the Lee Jae Myung government's five-year term ends in 2030, reportedly targeting 2028 for the transfer while US President Donald Trump is in office.

However, signs of differing views between the allies have emerged after US Forces Korea commander Gen. Xavier Brunson told Congress last month that the two sides seek to meet conditions required for the transfer no later than the first quarter of 2029.

His proposed timeline suggests the OPCON transfer may not be ready even after Trump's term ends on January 20, 2029.

South Korea handed over operational control of its forces to the US-led UN Command during the 1950-53 Korean War. It retook peacetime OPCON in 1994, but wartime operational command still remains in the US' hands.

Under a three-phase framework, conditions for the transfer include South Korea's capabilities to lead combined Korea-U.S. forces, its strike and air defence capabilities, and a regional security environment conducive to such a handover.

In last year's annual Security Consultative Meeting, Ahn and Hegseth agreed to develop a road map designed to expedite the implementation of conditions for the OPCON transfer and seek to certify the second part of the three-stage program.

The defence chiefs could also address Seoul's findings on the ship blast, as the suspected attack has raised the possibility that South Korea could reconsider its role in efforts to ease tensions in the Middle East.

Seoul has shown reservations about Trump's calls for naval assistance to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The government has said it is reviewing a US proposal for an international coalition aimed at ensuring freedom of navigation in the shipping route, dubbed the "Maritime Freedom Construct" (MFC).

On Sunday, Seoul indicated pursuing "all possible measures" to prevent a recurrence of incidents like the case of the HMM Namu cargo ship and that it is "closely" reviewing participation in the MFC.

At Monday's talks, the two sides are also expected to discuss Seoul's push to build nuclear-powered submarines, amid little progress since Trump gave the green light to the move during his summit talks with President Lee Jae Myung in October last year.

Before departing for Washington on Sunday, Ahn expressed confidence about making progress in talks on the strategic vessels. He did not rule out an inaugural meeting on nuclear-powered submarines taking place before the end of the first half.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The Strait of Hormuz incident with that cargo ship is worrying. South Korea being cautious about joining the US-led maritime coalition makes sense—India also prefers to work through multilateral frameworks like IONS rather than being seen as taking sides. Smart move by Seoul to keep options open while reviewing MFC.
V
Vikram M
US commander's timeline suggesting OPCON transfer may not happen until after Trump's term is very telling. Washington always keeps some leverage. South Korea needs to build indigenous capabilities fast—like India did with nuclear subs and aircraft carriers. We learned the hard way that relying too much on foreign partners delays critical milestones.
J
James A
As someone working in international affairs, the OPCON timeline debate reminds me of India's own experience with defense indigenization. South Korea's push for nuclear subs before 2030 is ambitious given the technology transfer hurdles. But their shipbuilding industry is world-class—if any country can do it fast, it's them.
S
Siddharth J
I'm a bit skeptical about the 2028 OPCON target. Conditions-based transfer means Seoul has to meet those three phases—leading combined forces, strike capabilities, and regional security. With North Korea's missile tests and China's assertiveness, that last condition is dicey. Hope Defence Minister Ahn gets clear commitments in Washington. 🤔
M
Michael C
The parallel between South Korea's nuclear submarine ambitions and India's Arihant program is striking. Both countries face nuclear-armed neighbors (North Korea/China) and need credible deterrents in the Indian Ocean and Sea of Japan. Seoul should collaborate more with Delhi on submarine technology and regional security

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50