Maharashtra to Challenge Bombay HC Land Order in Supreme Court

The Maharashtra government will challenge a Bombay High Court order granting 254.88 acres of prime land in Mira-Bhayandar to two private developers. Revenue Minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule announced that a Special Leave Petition will be filed in the Supreme Court. The High Court ruled on April 30, 2026, in favor of Estate Investment and Mira Real Estate Developers, despite the state's claim of ownership. Bawankule stated that unauthorised changes in revenue records since 1948 have been detected and the government will protect public property.

Key Points: Bombay HC Land Order Challenged in Supreme Court

  • Bombay HC grants 254.88 acres prime land to private developers
  • Maharashtra govt to challenge order in Supreme Court
  • Unauthorised changes in revenue records since 1948
  • Minister vows to protect state government ownership
3 min read

Bombay HC order granting Mira-Bhayandar land to private developers to be challenged in Supreme Court: Revenue Minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule

Maharashtra govt to file SLP in Supreme Court against Bombay HC order granting 254.88 acres in Mira-Bhayandar to private developers. Revenue Minister Bawankule vows to protect public property.

"We will firmly crush all attempts to grab government land by tampering with revenue records. - Chandrashekhar Bawankule"

Mumbai, May 9

The Maharashtra State Government is set to challenge the Bombay High Court order granting approximately 254.88 acres of prime land worth hundreds of crores in Mira-Bhayandar to two builders. According to state minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule, the government will file a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court against this order.

The Bombay High Court, on April 30, 2026, ruled in favour of handing over the land to Estate Investment and Mira Real Estate Developers. The Revenue Minister said that since the land belongs to the state government, the verdict was unexpected, directing that a Special Leave Petition be filed in the Supreme Court to defend the government's position.

According to a press release from Minister Bawankule's office, since 1948, unauthorised changes have been made in the revenue records without obtaining prior permission from the government. Initially, the names of 'Estate Investment Company' and later 'Mira Salt Works' were illegally inserted. In 1958, due to its use as salt pans, the name of the Central Government's Salt Department was added.

Subsequently, the matter regarding ownership reached the Supreme Court, which directed that an appeal be filed before the Thane District Collector. In 2002, the District Collector rejected the claim of Mira Salt Company and ordered that the entire land be vested with the state Government.

However, in 2019, the companies and the Central Government's Salt Commissioner filed a First Appeal in the Bombay High Court. On 30 April, the High Court rejected the Salt Commissioner's appeal and ruled that the land belongs to Mira Salt Works. Notably, the High Court appeal was only on the issue of maintainability, but the court decided the matter on the merits. As a result, there is now a possibility that the name of the private developer 'Mira Real Estate Developers' will remain on the government land.

Revenue Minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule stated that this land belongs to the State Government. "We will firmly crush all attempts to grab government land by tampering with revenue records. The Bombay High Court order effectively allows the transfer of government land to private owners. The Government of Maharashtra will challenge this order in the Supreme Court to protect public property. We will strongly defend the State's ownership rights over this valuable land."

He also added, "We are going by the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Section 29(3)(c) which states: Occupants- Class II shall consist of persons who before the commencement of MLRC have been granted rights in unalienated land under leases which entitle them to hold the land in perpetuity, or for a period not less than fifty years with option to renew on fixed rent, under any law relating to land revenue and in force before the commencement of this Code; and all provisions of this Code relating to the rights, liabilities and responsibilities of Occupants - Class II shall apply to them as if they were Occupants - Class II under this Code."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting how the High Court decided on merits despite the appeal being on maintainability. That feels legally shaky. But I also wonder—are these builders being scapegoated? The Salt Commissioner was involved too. Let's watch how this unfolds.
P
Priya S
As someone who lives in Mira-Bhayandar, housing prices are already sky-high. If this land goes to private developers, we'll see more unaffordable luxury projects while common people struggle. The Revenue Minister is right—government land must stay with the government. 🙏
M
Michael C
This is a classic case of corruption through historical record tampering. I'm glad Bawankule is taking it seriously. But my concern is: will the Supreme Court move fast enough? These cases drag on for years, and by then, developers might have already built on the land. Urgency needed!
V
Vikram M
I'm a lawyer. The High Court jumping to merits when the appeal was only on maintainability is procedurally problematic. That's a strong ground for an SLP. Also, Section 29(3)(c) of MLRC is clear—these companies don't qualify as Occupants Class II. The state has a solid case. 💪
N
Neha E
Ek baat samajh nahi aati—agar since 1948 hi illegal entry hui hai, toh itna time kyun lag gaya action lene mein? Aur Bawankule ki baat toh theek hai, but what about the previous governments that let this slide? Accountability sabko chahiye. 🤔

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50