India's Climate Path: Development Equals Decarbonization, Says ORF

A new ORF research paper calls for a Green Development Compact that merges Northern capital and innovation with Southern scale and renewable potential. It critiques current US and EU green industrial strategies as being too inward-looking, treating the Global South merely as a consumer market. The authors argue this approach is politically unsustainable for developing nations and inefficient for achieving the necessary global energy transition. They conclude that a new model of mutual dependence, reflected in innovative institutions and compacts, is essential for a shared future.

Key Points: India's Green Development Compact: ORF Research on Climate Strategy

  • Green Development Compact proposed
  • US/EU focus inward on green industrial policy
  • Global South seen as market, not partner
  • Transition needs scale, speed, Southern renewables
  • New financial instruments required for Southern projects
3 min read

Climate transition for India must be about development as much as decarbonisation: ORF research argues

ORF paper argues climate transition for India must prioritize development alongside decarbonization, proposing a new Green Development Compact with the Global North.

Climate transition for India must be about development as much as decarbonisation: ORF research argues
"for India--the climate transition must be about development as much as decarbonisation. - Samir Saran and Amitabh Kant"

Washington DC, February 6

A research paper from the Observer Research foundation proposes a Green Development Compact that integrates Northern capital, innovation, and corporate capacity with Southern scale, speed, and renewable endowments.

Authored by Samir Saran and Amitabh Kant the research argues that the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) have shifted beyond market-led climate action toward state-backed green industrial policy, driven by competitiveness, economic security, and technological leadership concerns. Despite differences in approach, Atlantic strategies share an inward focus that positions the Global South primarily as a consumer market or supplier of intermediate inputs. Such models are politically unsustainable for developing economies and economically inefficient for achieving the scale required for the global energy transition. The paper outlines practical instruments to operationalise this framework, including long-term offtake guarantees, shared innovation commons, and financial mechanisms that reduce risk for Southern projects.

In the research, the authors argue that the US and the European Union (EU) have moved past the Paris Agreement, and that they should be spending their already cash strapped economies in green industrialization.

"The global transition to energy-efficient production is the defining economic event of the century. As is the case with all such large-scale, global transformations, views and plans are filtered through as many prisms as there are national and sectional interests," their research observes.

It further said that the US is now massively focused on retaining American superiority and increasing foreign investments. The US is also assuming that it'll be ahead in retaining an input-cost advantage as compared to its peers.

The EU needs to grapple with job crises and securing fuel. They also have to exercise control over private sector that is not directly under their control.

For India, the research says, "As we have argued, however, for the Global South--including for India--the climate transition must be about development as much as decarbonisation. In other words, no country expects that its future within a new green world order is to remain at the periphery of the global value chain."

The Deese proposal for a "Clean Energy Marshall Plan" plans the subsidisation of domestic US manufacturing, alongside access to foreign markets that will absorb the goods so produced. Shorn of its green fledging, this is also broadly the Trump economic mandate. This is why, as many have already argued, Trump's industrial policy - with or without federal subsidies - will impact the global green transition similarly to Biden-era proposals such as Deese's. Both share an injection of liquidity alongside protectionist impulses, the research says.

The research brife argues that India and the Global South stand ready to be partners in this effort, and invite our Atlantic partners to look beyond models of the past to invent new ones for our shared future. Mutual dependence is a reality; the North needs our scale as much as we need their capital and technology. What is needed is for the institutions we build and the compact we design to reflect that reality, the research concludes.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting read. The comparison between Biden-era and potential Trump-era policies being similarly protectionist is stark. The Global South needs guarantees, not just promises. Long-term offtake agreements could be a game-changer for attracting investment here.
V
Vikram M
Absolutely correct! "No country expects... to remain at the periphery." Why should India just be a market for Western green tech or a supplier of raw materials? We need to move up the value chain. Make in India for the world, but with clean energy. Jai Hind!
P
Priya S
Well-argued paper. The "inward focus" of the US and EU is worrying. Climate change is global, but their policies are national. If the North wants real results, they must invest in building capacity here, not just selling finished products. Mutual benefit is the only way.
R
Rohit P
Good research, but I wish it offered more concrete steps for India's own policy. We can't just wait for Western capital. Our government and private sector need to double down on R&D and creating our own innovation commons. Self-reliance is key.
M
Michael C
The scale argument is powerful. The US and EU combined have under a billion people. India alone has 1.4 billion. The energy transition *cannot* happen at the required speed and scale without the active manufacturing and deployment power of the Global South. The math is simple.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50