MeitY Dismisses Curbing Dissent 'Myth' in New IT Rules for Online News

The Ministry of Electronics and IT has unveiled draft amendments to the IT Rules, 2021, proposing a new framework for regulating online news and current affairs content. MeitY Secretary S. Krishnan dismissed concerns that the changes would be used to curb dissent or remove anti-government content, labeling such fears a "myth." Key proposals include refining the definition of news content, sharing some oversight with the I&B Ministry, and expanding rules to cover non-registered digital creators. The draft is open for public consultation, with stakeholders raising questions about intermediary treatment and safeguards against misuse.

Key Points: IT Rules Amendments: MeitY Secretary Says No Curb on Dissent

  • Draft IT Rules amend online news regulation
  • Aims to clarify definitions and oversight
  • Expands scope to non-registered creators
  • Government seeks stakeholder feedback
2 min read

Claims of curbing dissent under IT Rules a 'myth': MeitY Secretary

MeitY proposes new IT Rules for online news, aims for clarity. Secretary Krishnan calls fears of anti-government content takedown a "myth."

"such claims a 'myth' - MeitY Secretary S. Krishnan"

New Delhi, April 7

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology on Tuesday unveiled draft amendments to the Information Technology Rules, 2021, proposing a fresh framework to regulate online news and current affairs content, while attempting to address concerns around overreach and censorship.

The ministry has opened the draft for public consultation, with the feedback window currently set to close on April 14, although officials indicated that the deadline could be extended to allow for wider participation.

Speaking after a stakeholder consultation, MeitY Secretary S. Krishnan sought to allay fears that the proposed changes would expand the government's authority or be used to curb dissent.

He dismissed concerns that the rules would lead to the takedown of anti-government content, calling such claims a "myth," and emphasised that any action would remain within the bounds of existing legal and constitutional provisions.

Krishnan said the amendments are driven by four key objectives, including enhanced requirements for data and information retention, improved compliance with existing guidelines, clearer definitions of key terms, and structural refinements to make the rules more effective.

One of the central changes involves refining the definition of "news and current affairs content," particularly in the context of Section 79(2)(c) of the IT Act, which deals with intermediary liability. According to the secretary, the updated framework aims to remove ambiguity and bring greater clarity to how such content is identified and regulated.

The draft also proposes a calibrated shift in regulatory oversight, with certain powers related to news content being shared with the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. While MeitY will retain overall authority, the move is intended to create a more clearly defined division of responsibilities between ministries.

Another significant proposal is the expansion of Part III of the rules to cover not only registered news publishers but also non-registered digital content creators. This would substantially widen the regulatory scope, bringing a broader range of online actors under a unified framework while introducing checks and balances.

However, the proposals have sparked debate within the industry. Stakeholders have raised concerns about how intermediaries will be treated under the revised rules, the precise scope of "news and current affairs content," and the adequacy of procedural safeguards to prevent misuse.

The government is expected to review stakeholder feedback before finalising the amendments, which could have far-reaching implications for India's digital news ecosystem.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Finally! Some structure for the wild west of online news. So much fake news and sensationalism spreads because there are no clear rules. If this brings accountability, especially for big social media influencers posing as news sources, it's a good move. 🇮🇳
R
Rohit P
The intention might be good, but I'm worried about execution. Sharing powers with I&B Ministry? That's the same ministry that regulates TV news. We've seen how that can go. Hope the "checks and balances" are real and not just on paper.
S
Sarah B
As a digital content creator, this is concerning. My explainer videos on current events could now fall under "news and current affairs." Will I need a lawyer to review every post? The compliance burden could stifle independent creators who are actually adding value.
V
Vikram M
Krishnan sir has a point about removing ambiguity. The current rules are a maze. If this brings a clear, transparent process for takedowns and appeals, it's progress. But the proof will be in the final rules. Let's see what comes out after the feedback.
K
Karthik V
The concern isn't about curbing *illegal* dissent, but about how "anti-government" is interpreted. Criticism is essential for democracy. The framework must protect fair criticism while targeting actual misinformation. A very thin line to walk.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50