Iran Slams US "Stone Age" Threat, Cites 7,000-Year Civilization

Iran's Permanent Mission to the UN has issued a sharp diplomatic rebuke to the US President's threat to "bomb Iran back to the Stone Age," calling it evidence of intent to commit war crimes. The response contrasts Iran's 7,000-year civilization with America's 250-year history, arguing a civilization defined by history and knowledge cannot be destroyed by bombing. The exchange comes amid soaring tensions, with an Iranian IRGC commander also dismissing US threats as "Hollywood delusions." This follows a US national address signaling an aggressive military escalation against Iran over the coming weeks.

Key Points: Iran UN Mission Rebukes US "Stone Age" Bombing Threat

  • Iran calls US threat a war crime
  • Contrasts 7,000-year vs 250-year history
  • Cites civilization's resilience and contributions
  • Tensions at fever pitch
  • US promises aggressive escalation
3 min read

"Civilisation cannot be destroyed by bombing": Iran hits back at US President's "Stone Age" threat

Iran's UN Mission condemns US President's threat as a war crime, highlighting Iran's 7,000-year civilization that "cannot be destroyed by bombing."

"Such a civilisation cannot be destroyed by bombing. - Iranian Mission to the UN"

New York, April 3

The Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations has issued a sharp response following recent comments from Washington, asserting that "the US President's explicit threat to 'bomb Iran back to the Stone Age' reflects ignorance, not strength, and constitutes evidence of intent to commit war crimes under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute."

In a post on X, the Iranian Mission to the UN shared the following: "The US President's explicit threat to 'bomb Iran back to the Stone Age' reflects ignorance, not strength, and constitutes evidence of intent to commit war crimes under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute. Iran's civilisation spans more than 7,000 years, whereas the US is scarcely 250 years old. Civilisations are defined by their history, culture, resilience, and scientific contributions. The world remains indebted to the civilisation and knowledge that Iranian scholars have bestowed upon humanity for millennia. Such a civilisation cannot be destroyed by bombing."

Highlighting the historical disparity between the two nations, the Mission further noted that "Iran's civilisation spans more than 7,000 years, whereas the US is scarcely 250 years old," while adding that "civilisations are defined by their history, culture, resilience, and scientific contributions."

Emphasising the enduring nature of their heritage, the Mission maintained that "the world remains indebted to the civilisation and knowledge that Iranian scholars have bestowed upon humanity for millennia," before further asserting its position by stating that "such a civilisation cannot be destroyed by bombing."

These diplomatic rebukes come as tensions between the US and Iran reach a fever pitch following a sharp exchange of warnings between top military and political leaders. Joining the diplomatic fray, IRGC commander Brigadier General Seyed Majid Moosavi issued a scathing response on X to recent American threats, accusing the US of leading its own personnel toward a fatal outcome.

Dismissing the rhetoric coming from Washington as a product of "Hollywood delusions," Moosavi took aim at US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's previous comments regarding military action. The Iranian commander contrasted the relatively short history of the US with Iran's ancient heritage, writing, "It is you who are taking your soldiers to their graves, not Iran, whom you seek to drag back to the Stone Age. Hollywood delusions have so poisoned your minds that, with your paltry 250-year history, you threaten a civilisation over 6,000 years old."

This defiant message from Tehran followed a highly anticipated national address by President Donald Trump, during which the US President maintained that while Washington has successfully reached its primary goals, the American military will continue to launch strikes against various locations throughout Iran.

Despite the lack of specific details regarding the nature of these accomplishments, Trump signalled an imminent and aggressive escalation, warning that the Islamic Republic would face devastating force over the coming weeks as the US seeks to systematically dismantle the nation's modern standing.

Emphasising his timeline for the campaign, the President stated, "Thanks to the progress we've made, I can say tonight that we are on track to complete all of America's military objections shortly. Very shortly. We're going to hit them extremely hard over the next two to three weeks. We're going to bring them back to the Stone Ages, where they belong."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an observer, the language from the US President is deeply concerning. It escalates tensions unnecessarily. The international community must step in to de-escalate. No civilization deserves to be threatened with annihilation.
V
Vikram M
While Iran's historical argument is strong, we must also remember that modern geopolitics isn't just about ancient history. Their government's actions in the region have also contributed to this crisis. A bit of introspection is needed from all sides.
P
Priya S
This is so scary. Another war in the Middle East will affect the whole world, including India. Oil prices will shoot up, and our economy will suffer. Why can't world leaders talk peace? 😟
R
Rohit P
"Bomb back to the Stone Age" – what kind of language is this from a world leader? It's utterly irresponsible. Iran's response is dignified in comparison. Hope cooler heads prevail.
K
Karthik V
The Iranian civilization has indeed given the world so much in science and mathematics. But the current regime's policies are problematic. The US threat is wrong, but Iran must also engage constructively. The people suffer in these conflicts.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50