CEA Nageswaran: Trade Skills Key to Scaling MSMEs into Global Chains

Chief Economic Advisor V Anantha Nageswaran advocates for integrating trade skills into MSMEs to scale them into global value chains. He emphasizes that human resource development is critical for India's economic growth, especially for micro-enterprises with 1-5 employees. Nageswaran calls for regulatory simplification and trust-based architecture to reduce compliance burdens on smaller firms. He also urges larger corporations to address working capital imbalances that currently favor them over smaller vendors.

Key Points: CEA Nageswaran: Trade Skills Key for MSMEs to Scale

  • CEA Nageswaran emphasizes trade skills for MSME growth into global value chains
  • MSMEs are "fountainheads of innovation" not "technological backwaters"
  • Regulatory simplification and trust-based architecture needed for micro-enterprises
  • Larger firms should relieve working capital imbalances for smaller vendors
3 min read

CEA Nageswaran advocates for trade skills integration to scale MSMEs into global value chains

CEA V Anantha Nageswaran urges MSMEs to invest in trade skills and regulatory simplification to integrate into global value chains for India's economic growth.

"Trade skills where human judgment skill and craftsmanship are important would be the areas like carpentry, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, civil...Investing in trade skills personally and for their own employees is the way to integrate themselves into domestic and global value chains - V Anantha Nageswaran"

New Delhi, May 12

Chief Economic Advisor V Anantha Nageswaran on Monday emphasised that the trajectory of the national economy depends on how inclusively small and medium enterprises are enabled to adapt and compete in future.

Addressing the CII Annual Business Summit 2026 in the national capital, Nageswaran noted that the integration of micro-enterprises into domestic and global value chains remains the primary driver for India's future economic growth, requiring a focused shift toward trade skills and regulatory simplification.

"I will focus on the importance of trade skills. No manufacturing enterprise in the country, regardless of the size, can function without skilled human resources. And those skills will also today have to be such that that makes them important and indispensable to the enterprise so that they are not replaced by either artificial intelligence or down the road by industrial robots," Nageswaran said.

He also mentioned that historical precedents in countries like Japan, Germany, and South Korea demonstrate that MSMEs serve as the "fountainheads of innovation" rather than "technological backwaters."

In the Indian context, where more than 90 per cent of micro-enterprises operate with an employment strength of one to five people, the CEA has identified human resource development as the critical bridge to scaling these operations.

"Trade skills where human judgment skill and craftsmanship are important would be the areas like carpentry, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, civil....Investing in trade skills personally and for their own employees is the way to integrate themselves into domestic and global value chains, because all enterprises in the manufacturing space are facing a shortage, regardless of size," Nageswaran said.

The CEA also suggested entrepreneurs that even a modest doubling of the average employment strength in micro-units would contribute significantly to national employment generation. To facilitate this, he proposed the formation of clusters that can collaborate to revamp Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs).

"The important thing is to make the industrial training institutes an aspirational place for our youngsters to go to. For them to be in dilapidated structures and buildings which don't look appetizing or inviting for youngsters is not the way to persuade them to embrace trade skills," he added.

On the regulatory front, Nageswaran highlighted that policymakers are pursuing a trust-based architecture to reduce the compliance burden that often hinders smaller firms with limited bandwidth. He pointed to the ongoing "Phase 2" of deregulation, which builds upon the 23 areas addressed in the previous year, focusing on self-certification and lengthening the validity of approvals.

"Regulatory architecture places disproportionately large burden on micro and small enterprises, given their limited bandwidth. They don't have that much time to devote to complaints, but they are required to do so. Larger enterprises can outsource such tasks. Small enterprises or micro enterprises in particular cannot afford to do that," Nageswaran said.

Addressing the financial relationship between industry players, the CEA called on larger corporations to resolve the working capital imbalances currently faced by smaller vendors.

He noted that micro-enterprises often inadvertently end up financing larger firms due to payment delays, despite having a higher cost of capital.

"Larger enterprises in the country have to pledge to contribute to relieving the working capital requirements of micro and small enterprises. In general, evidence around the country shows that micro, small, and medium enterprises are the source of working capital for large enterprises. It should be the reverse," Nageswaran stated.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
This is a refreshing take from an Indian policymaker. In the US, we often romanticized Silicon Valley-style innovation, but CEA Nageswaran is right — countries like Germany and Japan built their economies on skilled trades and strong SME networks. The idea of micro-enterprises being "fountainheads of innovation" rather than "technological backwaters" is powerful. India has the raw talent; it just needs the ecosystem to nurture it. Hope the Phase 2 deregulation delivers real results.
P
Priya S
The CEA's point about large companies exploiting small vendors is something nobody talks about enough. My father runs a small engineering firm that supplies to a well-known brand, and we've been waiting for payments for 8 months! Meanwhile, their finance team uses our money to invest. If they can't pay on time, how can we grow? The government should mandate timely payments or at least penalize delays. This "small unit finance large company" cycle has to break. 😤
R
Rohit P
Trade skills integration? I agree with the concept. But will the government actually fund the ITI revamp? Our local ITI in Bangalore is still running on 1980s equipment while asking students to learn modern plumbing and electrical work. Also, the "trust-based architecture" sounds good on paper, but in India, enforcement is weak. Without accountability, self-certification could lead to quality issues. That said, the human judgment + craftsmanship angle is smart — robots can't replace a good carpenter or electrician yet! 🔧
K
Kavya N
Honestly, I wish talks like this translate to ground reality faster. I work in a district industry center in Kerala, and we see micro-enterprises struggling every day. One carpenter told me he'd rather work in Dubai than stay here because of gulf wages. If we make ITIs aspirational and reduce

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50