BJD MP Backs India-US Trade Deal, Calls for Parliamentary Debate on FTAs

BJD MP Sasmit Patra has expressed support for India's proposed free trade agreements with the US, UK, and EU, stating they will benefit the country. However, he called for a detailed parliamentary debate on the deals to allow both the ruling side and Opposition to present their views. His remarks follow protests by Opposition MPs against the India-US interim trade agreement, which they labeled a "trap deal". The interim agreement involves reciprocal tariff reductions on a wide range of goods, from US agricultural products to Indian textiles and machinery.

Key Points: BJD MP Supports India-US, UK, EU FTAs, Seeks Parliamentary Debate

  • BJD MP supports India-US/UK/EU FTAs
  • Calls for detailed parliamentary debate on deals
  • Opposition protested interim India-US agreement
  • Deal involves tariff cuts on industrial, agricultural goods
3 min read

BJD MP Sasmit Patra backs FTAs, calls for detailed parliamentary debate

BJD MP Sasmit Patra supports India's FTAs with US, UK, EU but demands detailed parliamentary debate as Opposition protests the trade deals.

"Be it the India-US trade deal or India-UK and India-EU trade deals, all these FTAs will be beneficial for India. - Sasmit Patra"

New Delhi, February 12

BJD MP Sasmit Patra on Thursday voiced support for India's free trade agreements with the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union, while calling for a detailed parliamentary discussion on the deals to allow both the ruling side and the Opposition to present their views.

"Be it the India-US trade deal or India-UK and India-EU trade deals, all these FTAs will be beneficial for India. The issues relating to dairy, animal husbandry, agriculture, and fisheries were raised by the Opposition. Once all FTA paperwork is complete, there should be a detailed discussion of it. There should be a debate on the FTAs where both the ruling side and the Opposition voice their opinions," Patra told ANI.

Patra's remarks come after Opposition MPs staged a protest at the Makar Dwar of Parliament earlier in the day against the India-US interim trade agreement, terming it a "trap deal".

The protest coincided with a nationwide strike by trade unions and farmers opposing various central government policies, including labour codes, trade agreements, privatisation, and other measures perceived as anti-worker and anti-farmer.

This comes amidst the ongoing tussle between the government and the Opposition over the India-US interim trade in the current budget session.

On Wednesday, Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, while hitting out at the Centre over the India-US interim trade, said the Government itself has acknowledged that the world is facing a global storm, with the era of a single superpower coming to an end, intensifying geopolitical conflicts, and the weaponisation of energy and finance. Despite recognising this reality, he alleged, the government has allowed the United States to weaponise energy and financial systems in ways that affect India.

The India-US Interim Agreement, announced last week, is intended as a framework for a reciprocal and mutually beneficial trade pact between the two countries. The agreement will involve the elimination or reduction of tariffs on US industrial goods and a wide range of food and agricultural products, including dried distillers' grains, red sorghum for animal feed, tree nuts, fresh and processed fruit, soybean oil, wine and spirits, and additional products.

In return, the United States will apply a reciprocal tariff of 18 percent on selected Indian goods, including textiles, apparel, leather, footwear, plastics, rubber, organic chemicals, home decor, artisanal products, and certain machinery. Upon full implementation, US tariffs on items such as generic pharmaceuticals, gems and diamonds, and aircraft parts will be removed.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting to see a BJD MP taking this stance. While FTAs can open markets, the concerns about dairy and agriculture are very real for millions of Indian livelihoods. Hope the debate is substantive and not just political theatre.
V
Vikram M
Finally, a sensible voice! These FTAs with the US, UK, and EU are crucial for India's growth. We need access to their markets for our textiles, pharmaceuticals, and IT services. The 18% tariff on our goods seems fair if we get better access for our exports. Let's not be protectionist.
P
Priyanka N
The protest by trade unions and farmers shouldn't be ignored. What's the point of a "beneficial" deal if it hurts our own people? We've seen what happened with some past agreements. The government must ensure strong safeguards for our agricultural sector. Jai Kisan!
R
Rahul R
Rahul Gandhi's point about weaponisation of energy and finance is worth discussing, but we also need practical solutions. A debate is good, but it should focus on the fine print—what exactly are we giving up, and what are we getting? No more vague promises.
K
Kavya N
As a small business owner dealing in handicrafts, the removal of US tariffs on artisanal products sounds promising. But the "reciprocal" 18% tariff on our apparel and leather worries me. The debate must clarify how MSMEs will be supported during this transition. 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50