NewKerala.com

200 Judicial Officers From Jharkhand, Odisha to Speed Up Bengal Voter Roll Cleanup

The Election Commission of India is deploying 200 additional judicial officers from Jharkhand and Odisha to expedite the adjudication of approximately 60 lakh voter identity documents flagged with discrepancies in West Bengal. These officers will join the process on March 6 and will be allocated to districts based on the volume of pending cases. The final electoral roll published on February 28 excluded these cases, with supplementary lists to follow as adjudication progresses. Meanwhile, a dispute has arisen between the Chief Electoral Officer's office and a state officers' association over the attribution of responsibility for the pending cases.

Key Points: 200 Judicial Officers Join Bengal Voter Roll Adjudication

  • 200 additional judicial officers deployed
  • To adjudicate 60 lakh voter ID discrepancies
  • Officers arriving from Jharkhand and Odisha
  • Deployment based on district-wise case load
  • Supplementary electoral lists to be published later
2 min read

Bengal SIR: 200 additional judicial officers from J'khand, Odisha to join adjudication exercise

200 judicial officers from Jharkhand and Odisha to expedite adjudication of 60 lakh voter ID discrepancies in West Bengal's electoral roll.

"Districts with the highest number of 'under adjudication' cases will see a proportionately higher deployment - Commission official"

Kolkata, March 2

The Election Commission of India on Monday evening informed that 200 additional judicial officers -- 100 each from neighbouring Jharkhand and Odisha -- will join the ongoing judicial adjudication process relating to voters' identity documents flagged under the "logical discrepancy" category in the Special Intensive Revision exercise in West Bengal.

The additional judicial officers are expected to join the exercise on March 6.

Their deployment is aimed at expediting the adjudication of around 60 lakh voters' identity documents that have been placed under the "logical discrepancy" category.

Although the final electoral roll in West Bengal was published on February 28, it did not include the approximately 60 lakh cases marked as "under adjudication". Supplementary lists are to be published in due course, depending on the progress of the judicial adjudication process.

A senior official in the Commission said that the judicial officers arriving from Jharkhand and Odisha would be deployed district-wise based on the number of "under adjudication" cases in each district.

"Districts with the highest number of 'under adjudication' cases will see a proportionately higher deployment of judicial officers from these two neighbouring states," a Commission official said.

Meanwhile, a fresh exchange of statements took place between the office of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), West Bengal, and the West Bengal Civil Service (Executive) Officers' Association (WBCSEOA) over the issue.

Earlier in the day, the association accused Chief Electoral Officer Manoj Kumar Agarwal of attributing the marking of certain names as "under adjudication" in the final electoral roll to the functioning of Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) and Assistant Electoral Registration Officers (AEROs).

In a late evening statement, the CEO's office refuted the allegation and stated that it had not attributed all cases under adjudication to indecision by EROs and AEROs.

"However, a certain number of cases remained pending at the level of EROs/AEROs and were therefore referred for adjudication, which is factually verifiable. WBCSEOA cannot and should not assume the role of spokesperson for officers under deemed deputation to the ECI. Posting comments on the basis of hearsay and attempts to discredit constitutional bodies or statutory authorities can have serious consequences. Government servants are well advised to function within the Lakshman Rekha of the applicable conduct rules," the statement said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Why are there 60 lakh discrepancies in the first place? That's a huge number of voters whose status is unclear. It points to serious issues in the initial registration or revision process. Hope the judicial officers can bring clarity without any bias.
R
Rahul R
The statement from the CEO's office is very strong - "Lakshman Rekha of conduct rules". It seems there is a tug-of-war between the state bureaucracy and the Election Commission. The ECI must have full control over its deputed officers for a free and fair process.
A
Anjali F
As a voter from Kolkata, I just want to know if my name is on the final list or not. This "under adjudication" category creates so much uncertainty. I hope the process is transparent and we get the supplementary lists soon.
D
David E
Interesting to see inter-state cooperation for election integrity. Bringing in judicial officers from Jharkhand and Odisha is a smart way to ensure impartial adjudication, especially in a politically charged environment like Bengal. The focus should be on the rule of law.
K
Karthik V
While expediting the process is good, we must ensure quality is not compromised. Rushing through 60 lakh cases could lead to errors. Each case represents a citizen's right to vote. The officers must be given adequate time and resources to do their job properly.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50