Fri, 14 Aug 2026 · LIVE
Updated Aug 13, 2026 · 22:15
Education News Updated Aug 13, 2026

BCI Lifts Enrolment Ban on NALSAR 2026 Graduates, Says No Student Should Suffer Without Fault

The Bar Council of India has lifted its earlier restriction on the enrolment of NALSAR University of Law's 2026 graduates with State Bar Councils. The decision follows a thorough discussion by the BCI Council, which noted that the vast majority of students were innocent and had no intent to disrespect. The Council will await the Vice-Chancellor's inquiry report before deciding on further action against alleged instigators. The BCI emphasised that no student should suffer without fault on their part.

BCI lifts enrolment bar on NALSAR 2026 graduates, says no student should suffer without fault

New Delhi, August 13

The Bar Council of India on Thursday modified its earlier direction restricting the enrolment of 2026 graduates of NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad, with State Bar Councils, saying that all NALSAR students will now be entitled to enrol with the State Bar Council of their choice.

The decision came after the BCI Council discussed the matter and took note of the latest report that the vast majority of NALSAR's 2026 graduating students were innocent and had not intended to participate in any move aimed at showing disrespect.

In a communication dated August 13, 2026, signed by BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra, the Council said it had "thoroughly discussed and deliberated" on the earlier communication issued the same day concerning the factual inquiry and enrolment of NALSAR's 2026 passed-out students.

"Accordingly, the Council modifies the order of the Chairman with regard to the ban on the enrolment of the NALSAR Students with the State Bar Councils. All the students will be entitled to get enrolled with the State Bar Councils of their choice," the communication states.

The BCI, however, said it would await the inquiry report from the Vice-Chancellor of NALSAR before deciding what further action, if any, is required in the matter.

The Council also said it had received reports from "some reliable sources" that a handful of teachers and outsiders were instrumental in allegedly instigating the students. The BCI said further action would be taken after receiving the inquiry report from the Vice-Chancellor.

The latest communication effectively modifies the earlier BCI direction that had raised concerns over an alleged campaign at NALSAR relating to the proposed participation of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant in the university's convocation.

The BCI had sought a factual inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the campaign and the persons allegedly involved in initiating or organising it. The inquiry is expected to help the Council determine whether any individual or group was responsible for conduct warranting further statutory examination.

The Council has now made it clear that the 2026 graduates as a whole should not be prevented from entering the legal profession merely because of allegations concerning the conduct of some individuals.

"No student shall be made to suffer without any fault on his part," the BCI said in its latest communication.

The communication, issued with the approval of the BCI Council, has been addressed to the Vice-Chancellor of NALSAR University of Law and the Secretaries of all State Bar Councils.

The BCI's latest decision means that NALSAR's 2026 graduates can proceed with their enrolment before the State Bar Councils of their choice, while the factual inquiry into the controversy surrounding the convocation-related campaign will continue.

The Council will consider the matter further after receiving the Vice-Chancellor's report.

— ANI

Reader Comments

Priya S

This is the right decision, but why was there even an initial ban? Students shouldn't be held hostage to internal politics. The inquiry should identify the real culprits—whether teachers or outsiders—and take action against them specifically.

Vikram M

As a lawyer, I've seen how BCI sometimes acts in haste. This correction is welcome. No student should suffer without fault—that's the basic principle of natural justice. Good to see Mr. Mishra ji showing wisdom here.

Sarah B

It's encouraging to see an institution acknowledge when it oversteps. The legal profession should be about merit and fairness, not collective punishment. Hopefully, the inquiry will be transparent and lessons are learned by all parties involved.

Kavya N

I appreciate the correction, but I wish BCI would be more careful before issuing such sweeping bans in the future. These students went through immense stress and uncertainty because of a hasty decision. Accountability goes both ways.

Michael C

Fair call by BCI. Distinguishing between the innocent majority and any potential instigators is the correct legal approach. Let the inquiry proceed without derailing the careers of young professionals. 🇮🇳

Rahul R

The principle "no student shall suffer without fault" is central to justice. Good move, but

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked