Bangladesh's Jamaat Faces Shariah Dilemma Ahead of Crucial February Election

A report highlights the contradictory stance of Bangladesh's Jamaat-e-Islami party regarding the implementation of Shariah law as elections approach. While the party signals it may not implement Shariah for political power, its grassroots campaigns promote voting for it as a religious duty. This strategic ambiguity creates a profound dilemma for the party and its core supporters. The report demands the party's leader clarify its position so voters can make an informed decision.

Key Points: Jamaat's Dual Shariah Narrative Before Bangladesh Election

  • Strategic ambiguity on Shariah
  • Public vs grassroots narrative
  • Constitutional compatibility questioned
  • Voter's informed decision urged
  • "Ticket to paradise" campaigning
2 min read

Bangladesh: Jamaat engages in dual Shariah narrative ahead of Feb election

Report reveals Jamaat-e-Islami's contradictory stance on implementing Shariah law ahead of Bangladesh's February 12 general elections.

"Jamaat's ameer must publicly and unequivocally state whether Jamaat-e-Islami will implement Islamic Shariah if it comes to power. - Prothom Alo report"

Dhaka, Jan 28

Although Bangladesh's radical Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami signals when convenient that it will not implement Shariah if it comes to power, its leaders, including candidates for the February 12 general elections--openly advocate establishing Shariah law on television talk shows. Similarly, at the grassroots level, mid, lower-tier leaders and workers promote voting for the Jamaat electoral symbol 'daripalla' symbol as a religious duty, while some even present it as a "ticket to paradise", a report said on Wednesday.

According to a report in leading Bangladeshi daily Prothom Alo, this highlights a clear contradiction: while Jamaat signals it will not implement Shariah, the Shariah narrative continues to be actively promoted on the ground.

"Politically, Jamaat-e-Islami finds itself in a profound dilemma. Because the word 'Islam' is embedded in its name, and because it has long campaigned under the slogan 'We want Allah's law', a section of its core supporters votes for Jamaat precisely in the hope of establishing Islamic Shariah. At the same time, Jamaat appears to understand that pursuing state power makes the politics of Shariah implementation counterproductive to that objective," it mentioned.

The report stressed that this reflects the "strategic ambiguity", an approach Jamaat has adopted as the election draws near. Rather than clarifying its position, it said, Jamaat seeks to maintain both narratives simultaneously - a practice that should not be acceptable.

"Voting for Jamaat instead of the BNP (Bangladesh Nationalist Party) is not the same as voting for the BNP instead of the Awami League, or vice versa. There are fundamental ideological differences at stake. Jamaat's ameer must publicly and unequivocally state whether Jamaat-e-Islami will implement Islamic Shariah if it comes to power. If so, he must also present a clear framework for what that Shariah would entail," the report mentioned

It emphasised that if Jamaat or any other "Islamic" party in Bangladesh announces plans to establish Shariah, the question naturally arises as to whether such a party retains the right to participate in politics under the country's existing constitution.

The report further noted, "With the election approaching, Jamaat must urgently clarify its stance on Shariah and enable voters to make an 'informed decision' when exercising their franchise. Jamaat's top leadership should recognise that its strategic ambiguity on this issue directly contradicts its much-publicised slogan, 'We want the rule of honest people', and amounts, quite plainly, to duplicity (munafiqi, in religious terms)."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
It's sad to see religion being used as a political tool. Promising paradise for a vote? That's manipulation of the highest order. Voters, whether in Bangladesh or anywhere, deserve clear manifestos, not emotional blackmail. Hope the people see through this.
R
Rohit P
From an Indian perspective, stability in our neighborhood is crucial. A party with such contradictory stances can create internal strife, which eventually affects regional peace. The report is right—they must clarify their position unequivocally before the polls.
S
Sarah B
The term "munafiqi" (hypocrisy) used in the report is very strong. It highlights the ethical and religious contradiction perfectly. How can you campaign for "honest people" while being fundamentally dishonest about your core agenda? Voters should demand answers.
V
Vikram M
This is a classic case of saying one thing to the elite and media, and another to the grassroots. It shows a lack of respect for the intelligence of the common voter. Bangladesh has made significant progress; hope its people choose development over divisive politics.
K
Karthik V
While I respect every nation's right to choose its path, using religion as a political bargaining chip is dangerous. We've seen similar narratives elsewhere. The question about their right to participate under the existing constitution is the most critical one. The Election Commission must take note.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50