India Joins 135 Nations in UN Vote Condemning Iran's "Egregious" Regional Attacks

The UN Security Council has passed a resolution strongly condemning Iran's "egregious attacks" on several regional neighbors, including Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. The resolution, co-sponsored by a record number of nearly 140 states including India, demands an immediate end to strikes on civilian areas and threats to maritime trade. China and Russia abstained, criticizing the text as unbalanced and failing to address the conflict's root causes. The Council subsequently rejected a separate Russian draft resolution aimed at de-escalation without naming specific parties.

Key Points: UNSC Condemns Iran Attacks; India Among 135 Co-Sponsors

  • UNSC condemns Iranian attacks on 7 nations
  • Resolution demands halt to strikes on civilians & maritime threats
  • China and Russia abstain, calling text biased
  • Second Russian resolution for de-escalation fails to pass
3 min read

India joins 135 nations to back UNSC resolution condemning Iran's "egregious attacks" on regional neighbours

UN Security Council adopts resolution condemning Iran's strikes on neighbors. India joins 135 co-sponsors. China, Russia abstain.

"The message is clear: Targeting civilians is wrong, targeting cities is wrong, and Iran must stop. - Israel's representative"

New York, March 12

The United Nations Security Council has adopted a resolution condemning Iran's "egregious attacks" against its regional neighbours, as violence continues to spiral across the Middle East.

The 15-member Council passed Resolution 2817 (2026) with 13 votes in favour and two abstentions from China and the Russian Federation. The move comes as the conflict, which began on 28 February, nears its two-week mark and involves nearly a dozen nations.

Under the terms of the resolution, the Council condemned "in the strongest terms" Iran's strikes against Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan. The text specifically condemned Iranian attacks on "residential areas and civilian objects," demanding their immediate cessation.

The resolution also demanded that Tehran halt its "threats, provocations and actions aimed at interfering with maritime trade," alongside its support for proxy groups. Bahrain's representative welcomed the adoption, stating, "The message is clear," and noted that the "international community is resolute in rejecting these Iranian unjust, hostile acts."

The representative of the United States, serving as Council President for March, remarked that "Iran shoots in all directions," highlighting that a record number of nearly 140 Member States inclduing India co-sponsored the text. Denmark's representative added that at this "crucial moment, it is imperative to listen to the voices of the region."

France's representative placed heavy blame on Tehran, declaring, "Iran bears a heavy responsibility for the current escalation." Meanwhile, the representative of Liberia, also speaking for the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Somalia, noted their vote reflected a "principled commitment to diplomacy, dialogue, de-escalation and respect for international law."

China, which abstained, cautioned that the resolution "does not fully reflect the root cause and overall picture of the conflict in a balanced manner." Moscow's representative echoed this sentiment, describing the tone as "biased and one-sided," and argued that reading it without context suggests Tehran struck targets "out of pure malice."

Following the first vote, the Council rejected a second draft resolution tabled by the Russian Federation. The impartial document, which sought to de-escalate without naming specific parties, failed to pass, receiving only four votes in favour.

The United Kingdom's representative criticised the Russian move, stating it was "impossible to overlook the hypocrisy of Russia presenting itself here as a guardian of international peace and security." Latvia's delegate also voted against the Russian text, describing it as deeply "cynical."

In a defiant address to the Council, Tehran's delegate called the resolution a "manifest injustice against my country" and a "serious setback to the Council's credibility." Conversely, the representative of Israel welcomed the condemnation, stating the message is clear: "Targeting civilians is wrong, targeting cities is wrong, and Iran must stop."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Good to see India taking a clear position. Our energy security and the safety of our diaspora in the Gulf are directly linked to stability there. Iran's actions disrupt trade and put innocent lives at risk. Hope this leads to de-escalation.
A
Aman W
While condemning attacks on civilians is correct, we must be careful. The resolution seems one-sided, as China and Russia pointed out. What about the root causes? India's vote is understandable, but our diplomacy should also push for balanced dialogue, not just taking sides.
S
Sarah B
Living in Dubai, this hits close to home. The tension is palpable here. Glad India joined the condemnation. Regional stability is not just a political issue, it's about the safety of millions of expats, including so many Indians. Hope for peace soon.
V
Vikram M
Complex situation. India has historical ties with Iran, but also strong partnerships with the Gulf nations and the West. Walking this diplomatic tightrope is challenging. Supporting this resolution shows where our current strategic interests lie. Jai Hind!
K
Karthik V
The hypocrisy in the UNSC is astounding. Russia talking about peace after Ukraine? 🤦‍♂️ But that doesn't make Iran's attacks right. Targeting civilians is never acceptable. India's vote sends the correct message. Now, the focus must be on getting all parties to talk.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50