BAFTA Launches Review After N-Word Incident at 2026 Film Awards Ceremony

The British Academy of Film and Television Arts has initiated a comprehensive review following an incident at its 2026 awards ceremony where a guest with Tourette's syndrome involuntarily shouted a racial slur. The slur was audible as actors Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo presented an award, prompting immediate apologies from BAFTA to the presenters and the wider community. The BBC also apologized for failing to edit the remark from its delayed broadcast, noting the edit conflicted with other content decisions. The controversy has ignited a significant debate balancing disability inclusion with the prevention of racial harm, leading to internal fallout including a reported resignation.

Key Points: BAFTA Review After Racial Slur Incident at 2026 Awards

  • Slur shouted during presentation by guest with Tourette's
  • BAFTA apologises to presenters Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo
  • Incident sparks debate on disability vs. racial harm
  • BBC apologises for not editing slur from delayed broadcast
  • Internal fallout includes reported judge resignation
3 min read

BAFTA launches comprehensive review after N-word incident at 2026 ceremony

BAFTA launches comprehensive review after a guest with Tourette's syndrome shouted a racial slur during the 2026 ceremony, sparking debate.

"We would like to acknowledge the harm this has caused, address what happened and apologise to all. - BAFTA Letter"

London, February 25

Following the controversy at the 2026 EE Film Awards, British Academy of Film and Television Arts has confirmed that a "comprehensive review" is underway after a racial slur was audibly shouted during Sunday night's ceremony.

The incident occurred while actors Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo were presenting the award for Best Visual Effects. A guest in the audience, John Davidson MBE, involuntarily shouted the N-word, prompting a brief moment in which both presenters visibly froze before continuing with professionalism, as per Variety.

In a letter sent to members on Tuesday, BAFTA Chair Sara Putt and CEO Jane Millichip addressed the controversy directly.

"We would like to acknowledge the harm this has caused, address what happened and apologise to all," the letter, obtained by Variety, stated, adding that the academy takes "full responsibility for putting our guests and members of the academy in a very difficult situation."

The letter follows a public apology posted on BAFTA's Instagram account, in which the academy apologised unreservedly to Jordan and Lindo.

The statement acknowledged that the language used "carries incomparable trauma and pain for so many" and praised the actors for their "incredible dignity and professionalism."

Davidson, a Tourette syndrome campaigner and executive producer of the nominated film 'I Swear', has devoted his life to raising awareness about the neurological condition.

BAFTA and broadcaster BBC clarified that the slur was an involuntary verbal tic, known as coprolalia, associated with Tourette syndrome and was not intentional or reflective of Davidson's beliefs.

According to BAFTA's letter, the academy had prepared extensively to accommodate Davidson's attendance. Audience members were informed prior to the ceremony- and reminded during the event- that involuntary strong and offensive language, noises or movements could occur.

However, BAFTA acknowledged that "our intention to be inclusive in no way diminishes the impact of what happened."

During the ceremony, Davidson also shouted other profanities, including "shut the fk up" during Putt's speech and "fk you" during the Best Children's and Family Film acceptance.

He later chose to leave the auditorium and watch the remainder of the event from a screen. BAFTA thanked him for his "dignity and consideration" in doing so.

Davidson has since issued his own statement, saying he was "deeply mortified" and emphasising that his tics are not a reflection of his personal views or character.

The controversy has triggered broader debate around the intersection of disability awareness and racial harm.

The BBC issued a separate apology for failing to edit out the slur despite the ceremony being broadcast on a two-hour delay.

Critics noted that other moments, including filmmaker Akinola Davies Jr.'s "Free Palestine" remark, were edited out for time.

Internally, the fallout has been significant, with at least one BAFTA judge reportedly resigning over what was described as the "utterly unforgivable" handling of the situation, as per Variety.

The newly announced review comes six years after BAFTA undertook a major seven-month internal overhaul aimed at improving diversity, resulting in more than 120 changes to its voting, membership and campaigning processes.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
The BBC editing out "Free Palestine" but leaving in a racial slur on a delayed broadcast tells you everything about their priorities. Disgraceful. The apology rings hollow when their actions show such clear bias. The review needs to look at that decision-making process first and foremost.
A
Aman W
It's a sad incident all around. The man has a medical condition, the actors were hurt, and the organisers failed to mitigate the risk properly. Maybe for such high-profile live events, having a dedicated, soundproof viewing area for attendees with coprolalia is a solution? Inclusion shouldn't come at the cost of traumatising others on a global stage.
S
Sarah B
The professionalism of Jordan and Lindo is commendable. 👏 In India, we understand navigating complex social sensitivities. Intent matters, but so does impact. BAFTA's apology acknowledging the "incomparable trauma" is the right first step, but the review must lead to concrete protocols, not just more statements.
V
Vikram M
Respectfully, while I sympathise with Mr. Davidson's condition, inviting him to a live, televised event knowing the potential for such tics was a major error in judgment. The organisers' "intention to be inclusive" seems to have overridden basic event risk management. You can support disability awareness without setting up a situation where racial harm becomes an inevitable byproduct. The resignations are understandable.
K
Karthik V
This highlights a global issue we see in India too – how do institutions balance different forms of

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50