Supreme Court Allows Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State Since 2013

The Supreme Court has allowed the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for Harish Rana, who has been in a permanent vegetative state since 2013. His father, Ashok Rana, expressed profound gratitude to the judges, stating the decision brings relief to his family and could impact many others nationwide. The court's order directs that Rana be moved to AIIMS Delhi's palliative care unit for the procedure, following established medical guidelines. The ruling references the court's own 2018 landmark judgment in the Common Cause case, reinforcing the legal framework for passive euthanasia in India.

Key Points: SC Allows Passive Euthanasia for Harish Rana in Landmark Case

  • SC permits passive euthanasia
  • Harish Rana in vegetative state since 2013
  • Family's long legal battle ends
  • Ruling based on 2018 landmark guidelines
  • Case to set precedent for similar families
4 min read

'Eternally grateful': Father of Harish Rana expresses gratitude after SC allows passive euthanasia

Supreme Court permits passive euthanasia for Harish Rana, in a vegetative state since 2013. His father expresses gratitude, highlighting the ruling's national significance.

"We are eternally grateful to the honourable judges of the Supreme Court for their decision. - Ashok Rana"

Ghaziabad, March 11

With the Supreme Court permitting passive euthanasia for Harish Rana, who has been in a vegetative state since 2013, his father Ashok Rana on Wednesday expressed deep gratitude to the judges for their decision, saying that the order not only affects his family but could also bring relief to many other families facing similar situations across the country.

Talking to reporters, Ashok Rana said the legal battle had been long and emotionally difficult for the family.

"Four years ago, my wife had suggested that we approach the Prime Minister or the President regarding this issue. But at that time, I told her that such a step would not be possible," he said.

Rana explained that he later discussed the matter with members of the Brahma Kumari institution, with which he has been associated.

"I have been connected with the Brahma Kumari institution. I shared our situation with one of the senior members there. She helped us by sending a lawyer, Manish Jain, who guided us through the legal process," he said.

He added that the family initially approached the High Court before eventually taking the matter to the Supreme Court.

"We first went to the High Court and later to the Supreme Court. We are eternally grateful to the honourable judges of the Supreme Court for their decision," he said.

Ashok Rana also thanked the doctors who had been caring for his son over the years.

"The Supreme Court has given a good order to the state government. I want to thank everyone, especially the doctors who supported us during this long and painful time," he said.

He further noted that both he and his wife are growing older and have struggled to cope with the situation for years.

"We are getting old now. I am around 63 years old and my wife is 60. My son was declared brain dead long ago. This issue is not only about our family. In India, there must be many such cases where families are facing similar circumstances," he added.

Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court allowed passive euthanasia for a 31-year-old Ghaziabad resident who has remained in a permanent vegetative state for nearly 13 years, after suffering severe head injuries in a fall from the fourth floor while he was a student.

A Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan permitted the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for Harish Rana, observing that the medical Board may exercise its clinical judgment in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the apex court in its landmark 2018 ruling in Common Cause vs. Union of India.

Allowing the plea filed by his family, the Justice Pardiwala-led Bench directed that Rana be admitted to the palliative care unit at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, where the process of withdrawal of medical treatment can be carried out.

"In our considered view, it would be permissible for the medical Board to exercise its clinical judgment regarding the withdrawal of treatment in accordance with the guidelines laid down in Common Cause vs. Union of India," the apex court said.

Rana has been in a permanent vegetative state with 100 per cent disability and quadriplegia, requiring continuous medical assistance for breathing, feeding, and daily care.

Earlier, the Supreme Court had directed the constitution of a Primary Medical Board to assess whether withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment could be considered.

A team of medical experts that examined Rana at his residence reported that he was lying in bed with a tracheostomy tube for respiration and a gastrostomy tube for feeding, and that the chances of his recovery were negligible.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While I understand the family's pain, this sets a very dangerous precedent. Who decides what a 'permanent vegetative state' is? The sanctity of life is paramount. We need stronger safeguards to prevent misuse.
P
Priya S
It's heartbreaking to read. 13 years in that condition... the parents are in their 60s now. The SC has shown great humanity. This is not about ending life, it's about ending prolonged suffering for everyone involved. More power to the family.
R
Rohit P
The real issue is the lack of a clear legal framework. The 2018 guidelines are a start, but we need a proper law passed by Parliament. Families shouldn't have to fight for years in court for such painful decisions. Kudos to the lawyer who helped them pro bono.
M
Meera T
This is a very difficult topic for Indian families. We are taught to care for our loved ones at all costs. But what is the cost? The financial drain, the emotional trauma for the parents... it's a living nightmare. The court has given them peace.
D
David E
The mention of palliative care at AIIMS is crucial. India desperately needs to expand its palliative and hospice care infrastructure. The focus should be on dignity and comfort, not just prolonging life with tubes and machines.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50