Supreme Court Stays UGC's 2026 Anti-Discrimination Rules Amid Protests

The Supreme Court has stayed the University Grants Commission's 2026 regulations, which were introduced to curb caste-based discrimination in higher education institutions. The Court cited vagueness in a key clause and ordered that the previous 2012 regulations remain in effect for the time being. The new rules had sparked widespread protests from general category students who argued the framework could lead to discrimination against them. Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan had earlier sought to allay fears, assuring the law would not be misused.

Key Points: SC Stays New UGC Regulations, 2012 Rules to Continue

  • SC stays new UGC regulations
  • 2012 rules to continue for now
  • Rules aimed to curb caste-based discrimination
  • Sparked protests from general category students
3 min read

Amid uproar, SC stays UGC's new regulations, 2012 rules to continue

Supreme Court stays UGC's 2026 regulations on caste discrimination after protests. 2012 rules reinstated. Education Minister assures no misuse.

"The language needs to be re-modified. - Supreme Court"

New Delhi, January 29

Amid an uproar around the country, the Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the University Grants Commission Regulations, 2026.

The new UGC regulations, notified on January 23, were challenged by various petitioners as being arbitrary, exclusionary, discriminatory and in violation of the Constitution as well as the University Grants Commission Act, 1956.

The Top Court said that, for now, the 2012 UGC regulations will continue to apply. The Court opined that there is complete vagueness in Regulation 3 (C) (which defines caste-based discrimination), and it can be misused. "The language needs to be re-modified," the Court said.

The new regulations, introduced to curb caste-based discrimination in colleges and universities, require institutions to establish special committees and helplines to address complaints, especially from students belonging to the Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) categories.

The new rules notified by the UGC on January 13, which update its 2012 regulations on the same subject, have sparked widespread criticism from general category students, who argue that the framework could lead to discrimination against them.

Earlier on Wednesday, students, mostly belonging to the general category, staged a protest at Delhi University's North Campus against the newly notified University Grants Commission (UGC) equity rules, demanding their immediate withdrawal.

The protesting students claimed that the rules promote discrimination on campuses instead of equality. They pointed out that there was no binding provision for the representation of general category students.

However, Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan on Tuesday sought to allay concerns over the new UGC regulations, assuring that the law would not be misused and that there would be no discrimination in its implementation.

Speaking to the reporters, Pradhan said, "I assure everyone there will be no discrimination and no one can misuse the law."

On Tuesday, students in Lucknow staged a protest in front of Lucknow University, raising slogans against the UGC policies.

Earlier, Shyam Sundar Tripathi, Vice President of the BJP Kisan Morcha from the Salon constituency in Rae Bareli, had resigned from his post, citing dissatisfaction over new UGC policies. Tripathi announced his resignation in a letter written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

"Due to the black law, like the reservation bill, brought against the children of the upper caste, I am resigning from my post. This law is extremely dangerous for society and also divisive. I am completely dissatisfied with the bill. There is great resentment. I do not support this reservation bill. Supporting such an unethical bill is completely against my self-respect and ideology," read the letter written in hindi.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Finally some sense prevails! The protests by students were justified. How can you have rules against discrimination that themselves feel discriminatory to a large section? The intent to curb casteism is good, but the execution was flawed. Back to the drawing board, UGC. 👍
A
Ananya R
While I understand the need to protect students from discrimination, the new rules seemed to create more conflict than solutions. Campuses should be about unity and learning, not constant legal battles over vague definitions. Hope the revised regulations are more balanced.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, it's concerning to see such polarization on educational policy. The Supreme Court's intervention to pause and review is prudent. A law's framework must be robust enough to achieve its social goal without unintended negative consequences.
V
Vikram M
The Minister's assurance that the law won't be misused is not enough. The law itself must be watertight. The SC has rightly pointed out the vagueness. We need policies that build an inclusive environment for ALL students, not ones that feel like a zero-sum game.
K
Karthik V
This is a complex issue. Caste-based discrimination is a real problem that needs addressing, but the solution cannot be another set of rules that are open to interpretation and misuse. The stay allows for cooler heads to prevail and draft a more effective regulation. Jai Hind.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50