US Lawmaker Warns India Trade Deal Could Flood Market with Cheap Shrimp

Congressman Clay Higgins has written to President Trump expressing concern that the new US-India trade framework could severely impact American shrimpers. He warns that reduced tariffs will lead to a surge of cheaper, farm-raised Indian shrimp, undermining domestic wild-caught producers. Higgins highlights the superior environmental and health standards of Gulf shrimp compared to many imports. He urges the administration to enforce strict inspections and trade laws to protect the domestic industry.

Key Points: US-India Trade Deal Threatens American Shrimpers, GOP Warns

  • GOP warns of harm to US shrimpers
  • Contrasts wild-caught vs. farm-raised standards
  • Urges enforcement of health and trade laws
  • Seafood is sensitive area in US-India trade
3 min read

American shrimp industry hit by India trade deal: Republican Congressman

A Republican congressman warns the US-India trade framework could harm Gulf Coast fishermen by lowering tariffs on imported Indian shrimp.

"The reduction of tariffs on Indian goods will reopen the floodgates to low-quality, farm-raised Indian shrimp. - Congressman Clay Higgins"

Washington, Feb 11

A Republican congressman from Louisiana has raised alarm over the potential impact of the new US-India trade framework on American shrimpers, warning that lower tariffs on Indian seafood could harm the domestic wild-caught industry.

In a February 3 letter to President Donald Trump, Congressman Clay Higgins said he supports efforts to rebalance trade but voiced concern about consequences for Gulf Coast fishermen.

"While I commend your leadership in securing the framework of the recent United States-India trade deal and the broader goal of rebalancing trade in America's favor, I remain concerned about impacts on our domestic shrimpers and fishermen," Higgins wrote in his letter to Trump that was released to the press on Tuesday .

He warned that "The reduction of tariffs on Indian goods will reopen the floodgates to low-quality, farm-raised Indian shrimp."

Higgins noted that India "has long been among the largest importers of shrimp to the United States," adding that "the temporary relief provided by your earlier tariff actions allowed our shrimpers to breathe again."

The Louisiana lawmaker contrasted domestic production standards with imports.

"Our wild-caught Gulf shrimp is among the best in the world and is harvested in accordance with strict environmental and labor standards," he wrote. "In stark contrast, much of the shrimp imported into the United States benefits from lower environmental oversight and substandard public health guidelines from foreign seafood industries."

In the absence of higher tariffs on Indian seafood, Higgins urged the administration to consider alternative measures within the framework of the new agreement.

"This can be achieved by enhanced inspections under 21 US Code § 381(h), vigorous enforcement of existing antidumping and countervailing duties through 19 US Code § 1671, the imposition of shrimp-specific safeguards to prevent a renewed surge of underpriced imports, and supporting legislation such as H.R. 2715, the Destruction of Hazardous Imports Act, which would allow the destruction of product that does not meet American health standards," he wrote.

Appealing directly to the President, Higgins added: "Mr. President, you have consistently stood with American workers and producers against unfair trade practices."

"The fishermen of Louisiana are proud Americans who ask only for a fair chance to compete and a level playing field," he said. "I respectfully request that your Administration act promptly to ensure that the benefits of fair trade policy extend to every American industry, including our crucial domestic shrimpers."

The letter was also copied to the Secretaries of Homeland Security, Commerce, and State, as well as the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

The shrimp issue has surfaced as Washington and New Delhi move to deepen economic ties under a new trade framework aimed at reducing tariffs and expanding market access across sectors. Seafood has long been a sensitive area in U.S. trade debates, particularly in coastal states with large fishing communities.

India is one of the world's leading exporters of shrimp to the United States.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
A trade deal should benefit both sides. If the US wants greater access to our markets for their goods, they must also accept our competitive exports. This is how global trade works. Hope our negotiators stand firm.
A
Aman W
The congressman is just protecting his local vote bank, which is understandable. But his language is problematic. "Floodgates" and "low-quality" paint a negative picture without basis. Our seafood passes strict FDA checks.
S
Sarah B
As someone who has lived in both countries, I see both sides. American shrimpers are struggling, but Indian shrimp is affordable and meets safety standards. The solution isn't higher tariffs but maybe better labeling so consumers can choose.
V
Vikram M
This is a big export earner for us and provides livelihoods to so many. The US can't have it both ways - they want to sell us their apples and almonds but block our shrimp? A balanced deal is key.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, the congressman's concerns should be addressed with facts, not fear. Indian seafood industry has made huge strides in quality. Instead of blocking trade, both countries should work on mutual recognition of standards. 🤝

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50