NewKerala.com

Supreme Court Empowers 19 ECI Tribunals in West Bengal Voter List Appeals

The Supreme Court has ruled that the 19 Appellate Tribunals established by the Election Commission of India in West Bengal will have complete access to all records and materials from the original adjudicating authorities. This access is intended to ensure the tribunals can effectively decide final appeals regarding inclusion or exclusion from the electoral rolls. The Court emphasized that the tribunals must examine these records, consider the judicial officers' reasons, hear the parties involved, and deliver reasoned orders. The matter has been scheduled for a further hearing on April 6.

Key Points: SC: ECI Appellate Tribunals Get Full Access to Voter Roll Records

  • 19 Appellate Tribunals set up by ECI
  • Full access to original records mandated
  • Must pass reasoned orders after hearing parties
  • Can regulate procedure per natural justice
  • Next hearing listed for April 6
2 min read

19 Appellate Tribunals set up by ECI to have full access to records in voter list appeals in West Bengal

Supreme Court directs 19 ECI Appellate Tribunals in West Bengal to access all records for final voter list appeals, orders reasoned decisions.

"The Appellate tribunal will have access to the report which was placed by the parties before the adjudicator - Supreme Court"

New Delhi, April 1

The Supreme Court has noted that the 19 Appellate Tribunals notified and set-up by the Election Commission of India in the State for the purpose of final adjudication of applicants will have full access to the records and materials placed before the original adjudicating authorities to effectively decide finality of appeals concerning inclusion or exclusion from electoral rolls.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) noted that the Appellate Tribunals must examine the records, consider the reasons given by judicial officers, hear the parties and pass reasoned orders. While the Tribunals may regulate their own procedure in line with principles of natural justice, they should not entertain fresh objections unless they first verify the genuineness of such claims, the apex court observed.

The Court has listed the matter for the next hearing on April 6 at 4 pm, considering that the ECI's bid to freeze the voter list with the apex court's approval/consideration.

"As regard to the issue relating to providing reasons as pointed out by learned Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court, counsel for ECI informs that the Appellate tribunal will have access to the report which was placed by the parties - before the adjudicator to ensure that members of tribunal will have access to record for the purpose of disposing off appeals of persons whose names have been excluded from the voter lost or their inclusion. It goes without saying that the Appellate Tribunal carefully access the records along with reasons by the judicial officers adjudicating objections, and after apprising the parties give reasons to them for their exclusion/inclusion," the court noted.

"The AT shall be at liberty to follow their own procedure and the principles of natural justice. However, we entrust AT not to entertain fresh objections that have not been adjudicated by the judicial officers without verifying the genuineness of the parties. List on April 6 at 4 pm", the Court added.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
Good move. But I hope this process is swift. The hearing is on April 6th, and elections are around the corner. Delays in finalizing the voter list can cause problems for genuine voters on polling day. The ECI must ensure these tribunals work efficiently.
A
Arun Y
Finally some clarity! The instruction that tribunals should not entertain fresh objections without verifying genuineness is key. This should prevent last-minute, politically motivated challenges to voter inclusions/exclusions. Our democracy needs such safeguards.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, it's reassuring to see the Indian judiciary actively shaping electoral procedures to be more robust. The emphasis on "reasoned orders" and access to original records is a global best practice for dispute resolution.
V
Vikram M
With respect, while the SC's direction is good, setting up 19 tribunals just for one state shows how politicized and messy the voter list issue has become in Bengal. The basic process of enrollment should be beyond doubt. This is a corrective measure for a problem that shouldn't exist.
K
Kavya N
My uncle's name was missing last time. It was a huge hassle. Hope these appellate tribunals are easily accessible to common people and not just through lawyers. The "principles of natural justice" must include being citizen-friendly.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50