Sabarimala row: SC asks Advocate Mathew to file written submission for rehearing of case
New Delhi, Feb 7: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked advocate Lawyer Mathew Nedumpara to file written submissions adding that if required the court could grant him an oral hearing in the Sabarimala case.
Travancore Devaswom Board Counsel Rakesh Dwivedi said the board decided to honour the judgment and has appealed the Supreme Court to dismiss the review petitions.
The board has taken a conscious decision to support and respect the judgment of the Supreme Court and implement it. The board thinks that is right judgment in the right direction and it grants equality to women in the matters of worship, he told ANI.
In November last year, the TDB had moved the top court seeking an extension for implementation of the verdict which lifted the age-old ban on entry of women of menstruating age inside the hill shrine.Reacting on the TDB's current stand on the issue, Travancore Devaswom Board's former president Prayar Gopalakrishnan alleged that the decision of the board was 'influenced by a political party or their government'.
I was TDB President, at that time there was no politics in official work but present Devaswom Board is acting as per the instruction of political parties or their government...Devaswom Board has repeated their U-turn style, he claimed. However, Travancore Devaswom Board's current president A. Padmakumar outlined that its previous stand was based on the affidavit that the board filed before the verdict was announced, adding that it has already said that it will accept the verdict.
Court asked for Devaswom Boards opinion based on the verdict. Based on the September 28 verdict we have already decided not to file a review petition. Devaswom accepts the SC verdict. We are of the opinion that there shouldn't be any discrimination. The previous stand was based on the affidavit the board has filed, after that, the verdict came. We already said that we will accept the verdict, that is exactly what we have informed the court now, he said.
Padmakumar also refuted allegations of the board being influenced by the government and said, The board doesn't take a stand based on the influence by the government. Let the court decide after listening to the option of various parties. If there is a fresh order which is contrary to the existing one, we are bound to implement that as well.BJP had hailed the verdict initially, their mouthpiece even gave a header Historic Verdict, under whose pressure did they change that? asked Padmakumar.
Nearly four months after the top court permitted women of all ages to enter the temple on September 28, two women aged below 50 entered the Lord Ayyappa temple to offer prayers.
Violent protests broke out all across the state, while a purification process took place in the temple following the entry of these two women- Bindu and Kanakadurga.On February 4, Kerala Devaswom Minister Kadakampally Surendran had informed the State Assembly that the government had confirmation about only two women in the age group of 10-50 years having offered prayers at the Sabarimala temple.
Surendran had also said that there was no confirmation yet on the age of a Sri Lankan woman who visited the temple in January this year