Hundreds of foundations gathering in Miami this week for the Council on Foundations' annual conference have an opportunity to sharpen and deepen their commitment to a future where all communities - including immigrants and refugees - thrive.
A history of under-investment
Research by the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP)'s new Movement Investment Project indicates that in the years prior to the 2016 elections, barely 1% of grants by the largest 1,000 U.S. foundations was intended to benefit immigrants and refugees.
Only a very small portion of that foundation funding went to states and regions where the threats to immigrants and refugees were highest.
For example, Florida sees almost six times as many deportations as New York or Illinois and yet received only a fraction of grant dollars per immigrant.
The state's grantmakers accounted for 33% of the total funding for Florida's immigrant justice movement. Foundations outside Florida accounted for the rest.
The history of this country shows that systems like racism and xenophobia can only be changed through diverse and courageous segments of our society, including philanthropy, supporting vibrant social movements led by those most affected, wrote Maria Rodriguez, executive director of Florida Immigrant Coalition, in a commentary for the Miami Herald.
During the first half of the Trump presidency, NCRP's small, but representative, sampling of pro-immigrant groups across the country found that more than 60 foundations that had not funded the movement in previous years provided new grants to these groups in 2017 and 2018.
However, the State of Foundation Funding for the Pro-Immigrant Movement found that the movement's new funders represented only a fraction of philanthropic dollars going to pro-immigrant movement groups. About 90% of 2017-2018 foundation funding in the NCRP sample set came from existing movement funders giving larger grants.
NCRP's extensive interviews with movement leaders as well as quantitative data from Foundation Center identified a large gap between the small pool of funders and the urgent and long-term threats that immigrant communities face.
According to NCRP, there are two specific areas where philanthropic investments can go a long way to fill these gaps
Funding state- and local-level organizing to strengthen and grow immigrant communities' ability to defend against threats such as deportations and anti-immigrant policies.
Explicitly identifying immigrants and refugees as constituencies in supporting a broad range of issues such as criminal justice, children and youth, health, gender equity and more.
Opportunities for foundations and donors to invest in a vibrant, inclusive future
According to the NCRP's research, pro-immigrant movement leaders have five recommendations for funders
Give long-term, flexible and capacity building support to frontline groups.
Fund organizing and services to address short-term needs while seeking long-term solutions.
Help grantees access 501(c)4 dollars so they can use a greater range of strategies.
Work with other funders to ensure that all aspects of the movement have adequate resources and to fund across different social issues.
Deploy philanthropic social capital and networks.
Philanthropy can't stay on the sidelines as community-powered organizations are holding the line, working to move us closer towards a safer, healthier and stronger future, said Aaron Dorfman, chief executive of NCRP. Funders need to seize the moment because a country where immigrants thrive is one where we all thrive.