World Court Ruling: Israel Ordered to Halt Gaza Starvation Amid UN Relief

The World Court has issued a strong advisory opinion requiring Israel to uphold human rights in Palestinian territories. The ruling specifically prohibits using starvation as a warfare method and mandates cooperation with UN relief agencies. Israel immediately rejected the decision, calling it politically motivated and unfair. Despite being non-binding, the opinion represents a significant diplomatic victory for the United Nations amid the ongoing Gaza humanitarian crisis.

Key Points: ICJ Orders Israel Uphold Human Rights in Palestine Work With UN

  • Court orders Israel to ensure essential supplies reach Palestinian civilians
  • Israel rejects ruling as politicization of international law
  • US joins criticism calling opinion unfairly biased against Israel
  • UN Secretary-General urges Israel to comply with court's obligations
3 min read

World Court declares Israel 'obligated' to uphold human rights in Palestine, work with UN 

International Court of Justice declares Israel must prevent starvation in Gaza and cooperate with UN relief agencies, though ruling is non-binding advisory opinion.

"to respect the prohibition on use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare - International Court of Justice"

United Nations, Oct 23

The World Court has declared that Israel is obligated to uphold international human rights law in the Palestinian territories and work with the UN and other international organisations to provide relief to the people there.

Issued on Wednesday in The Hague at the request of the General Assembly, it is only an advisory opinion, and Israel is not obliged to abide by it; however, it is a victory for the UN.

In the scathing opinion, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as it if formally known, said Israel has "to respect the prohibition on the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare" and must ensure that "the essential supplies of daily life, including food, water, clothing, bedding, shelter, fuel, medical supplies and services" are provided to the people in the Palestine territories.

The UN has said that the people in Gaza are facing the threat of famine and starvation because Israel has restricted relief supplies entering the territory during its military action against Hamas, which launched a terrorist attack against it in 2023.

The court said that Israel was obligated to work with the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which provides food aid and multifarious services to the Palestinian people. Israel has effectively banned the organisation, accusing its employees of involvement with Hamas.

"While The Hague accuses Israel, it deliberately ignores the war crimes of Hamas and the role of UNRWA, which has long become a breeding ground for terror in Gaza," Israel's Permanent Representative Danny Danon posted on X.

Israel's foreign ministry strongly rejected the opinion, calling it "politicisation of International Law, which seeks to produce political outcomes."

The US State Department joined in criticising what it called a "nakedly politicised non-binding 'advisory opinion'."

It "unfairly bashes Israel and gives UNRWA a free pass for its deep entanglement with and material support for Hamas terrorism," it added.

However, Secretary-General Antonio Guterres welcomed the opinion, according to his Spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.

"The Secretary-General strongly urges Israel to comply with its obligations in relation to the presence and activities of the United Nations and other humanitarian actors in the Occupied Palestinian Territory in accordance with the Advisory Opinion," he said.

Following the Gaza deal by US President Donald Trump between Israel and Hamas on October 8, Israel is obligated to allow relief supplies into Gaza, and relief trucks have begun delivering relief.

The resolution making the referral was adopted last year with 137 votes, including that of India, and 12 against, with 22 abstentions, while the Gaza conflict raged.

The Court's President Yuji Iwasawa read out the opinion, which was unanimous on some points, with Vice President Julia Sebutinde as the sole dissenter on others.

In another advisory opinion last year, the court said that Israel's continued occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem, which it seized in the Six-Day War in 1967, was unlawful.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
While I support humanitarian aid, the court seems to ignore Hamas's role completely. UNRWA has serious credibility issues that need addressing. Both sides must be held accountable for peace to be possible.
S
Sarah B
India voted for this resolution last year, showing our commitment to international law and human rights. As a nation that values peace, we must support efforts that protect innocent civilians caught in conflicts.
A
Arjun K
Advisory opinions are just that - advisory. Without enforcement mechanisms, what difference will this really make on the ground? The people of Gaza need immediate relief, not just legal statements.
M
Meera T
As an Indian who believes in Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world is one family), I'm glad to see international institutions trying to protect human dignity. No political conflict justifies starving civilians. 🕊️
D
David E
The court's unanimous opinion on some points shows this isn't just political posturing. When judges from different legal systems agree on fundamental principles, we should pay attention to their wisdom.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50