White House signals tough line after US seizes Venezuelan tanker carrying 'sanctioned oil'
Washington, Dec 12
The White House defended the US seizure of a Venezuelan oil tanker, calling it an enforcement step under American sanctions policy and declining to rule out further actions against illicit shipments in the region.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the Department of Justice, working with the Coast Guard and the Department of War, had taken control of what she described as “a sanctioned shadow vessel known for carrying black market sanctioned oil to the IRGC.â€
She said the vessel is now in a “forfeiture process,†with investigators interviewing crew members and collecting evidence.
“As you know, the vessel will go to a US port and the United States does intend to seize the oil,†she said, adding there is “a legal process for the seizure of that oil and that legal process will be followed.â€
When asked whether the action represented an escalation or a step toward war, Leavitt responded that Trump views it simply as enforcement. “The President considers the seizure of the oil tanker as effectuating the administration's sanction policies,†she said.
She also declined to preview whether further maritime or on-land actions may be taken. “I won't broadcast any future actions… but we’re not going to stand by and watch sanctioned vessels sail the seas with black market oil, the proceeds of which will fuel narco-terrorism of rogue and illegitimate regimes around the world.â€
The oil seizure came amid rising tensions between Washington and Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Asked whether Trump was concerned that Russia’s Vladimir Putin had phoned Maduro to signal support, Leavitt replied: “I don't think that would be concerning to the President at all.â€
Separately, she confirmed that Trump has not spoken to Putin about the issue. She also avoided commenting on whether the President would consider a formal invitation from Colombia to visit the country following his sharp criticism of President Gustavo Petro.
The unfolding standoff has global energy implications. The Press Secretary did not address whether Venezuelan oil seized by the US could be redirected to domestic markets, a question raised amid Trump’s emphasis on lowering energy costs.
India, a significant buyer of Venezuelan crude before US sanctions tightened, has closely monitored such disruptions. Any escalation in US enforcement affects global supply patterns and pricing, particularly for refiners that previously relied on Venezuelan heavy oil.
US-Venezuela tensions have fluctuated over the years, with sanctions targeting illicit oil flows, narcotics networks, and political repression. The previous Biden administration briefly explored easing measures, but Trump has reimphasized strict sanctions enforcement during his second term.
— IANS
Reader Comments
The global energy market is like a chessboard, and we are just pawns. When the US seizes oil, it's "enforcement." If any other country did it, it would be called piracy or aggression. The double standards are glaring. This will definitely push up petrol prices here.
Honestly, if the oil was truly going to fund terrorism, then the seizure is justified. No one wants that. But the US needs to be transparent. Where will this seized oil go? If it's sold to lower their own energy costs, then it's just economic opportunism wrapped in a security blanket.
Watching from an Indian perspective, the geopolitical tussle is concerning. Russia backing Venezuela, US seizing ships... it feels like the world is getting divided into camps again. India's diplomacy will be tested to navigate this and keep our energy imports steady without picking sides.
The timing is interesting. With elections everywhere, tough actions make for good headlines. But for the common man in India, all this "enforcement" translates to one thing: a heavier burden on the monthly budget. We need stable, affordable energy, not more global drama.
While I understand the need to curb illicit funds, the method sets a dangerous precedent. Can a nation's navy just seize another country's vessel on the high seas? The UN and international law seem sidelined. This approach creates more instability than it solves.
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.