Key Points

The United Nations Security Council convened an emergency session amid heightened Iran-Israel tensions and missile exchanges. IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi warned that military actions targeting nuclear installations could have severe regional and global consequences. Diplomats from both sides presented conflicting narratives about the ongoing conflict and potential diplomatic resolutions. The international community remains deeply concerned about the potential for further escalation in the Middle East.

Key Points: Iran Israel Missile Crisis UN Security Council Emergency Meet

  • Iran launches missiles in retaliation for nuclear facility attack
  • UNSC meets in emergency session to discuss escalating tensions
  • IAEA warns of potential grave consequences for nuclear facilities
3 min read

While Iran rained missiles on Israel, UNSC met in emergency session

UN warns of grave nuclear facility risks as Iran-Israel tensions escalate with missile strikes and diplomatic confrontation

"We must at all costs avoid a growing conflagration - Rosemary DiCarlo, UN Under-Secretary-General"

United Nations, June 14

Even as Iran was raining missiles on Israel in retaliation for the attack on its nuclear facilities and leaders, the Security Council heard International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) top official warn that attacks on nuclear installations could have “grave consequences”.

IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said, "Any military action that jeopardises the safety and security of nuclear facilities risks grave consequences for the people of Iran, the region, and beyond."

The IAEA General Council has declared that military attacks on nuclear facilities violate the UN Charter and international law, he said.

UN Under-Secretary-General Rosemary DiCarlo told the Council Emergency session convened at the request of Iran, "We must at all costs avoid a growing conflagration which would have enormous global consequences".

She said that Israel attacked Iran as "significant diplomatic developments" were afoot with talks between Washington and Tehran set to resume in Oman on Sunday. Iran has pulled out of the negotiations.

DiCarlo said, "A peaceful resolution through negotiations remains the best means to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme".

A senior US State Department official, McCoy Pitt, said the US was still willing to negotiate.

"We seek a secure peace", he said. "As President Trump said, the violence should come to an end, and Iran should make a deal so that there is 'no more death, no more destruction'. The United States will continue to seek a diplomatic resolution that ensures Iran will never acquire a nuclear weapon or pose a threat to stability in the Middle East", he said.

"Iran's leadership would be wise to negotiate at this time", he added.

During US President Donald Trump's first term, he pulled out of an international agreement to stop Iran's programme to produce materials for a nuclear bomb in return for removing some international sanctions.

However, recently he tried to work out a new agreement with Tehran, and those efforts have now been blocked by Israel's attack on Iran.

Iran's Permanent Representative Amir Saeid Iravani, said Israel's attack was meant "to kill diplomacy, to sabotage negotiations, and to drag the region into wider conflict".

He also accused Washington of being complicit in the Israeli attack.

Pitt denied that the US was involved in the attack, although it had been informed of it in advance.

Israel's Permanent Representative Danny Danon defended his country's action, calling it "an act of national preservation".

He displayed a picture of a countdown clock in Tehran that was timed to its plan to annihilate Israel.

Israel's mission was to "neutralise the (Iranian) regime's ability to follow through on its repeated public promise to destroy the State of Israel", he said.

Danon said the strikes in Iran were precise and targeted the nuclear facilities.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments for the article:
R
Rajesh K.
This escalating conflict is worrying for global peace. As Indians, we know how dangerous nuclear tensions can be in our neighborhood (looking at Pakistan). The UN must act decisively before this becomes another Middle East crisis that affects us all. 🕊️
P
Priya M.
While Israel has security concerns, attacking nuclear facilities is extremely reckless. We saw what happened in Fukushima - radiation doesn't respect borders. IAEA is right to warn about grave consequences. Hope our MEA is monitoring this closely given our energy projects with Iran.
A
Amit S.
The hypocrisy is astounding! When Pakistan-based terrorists attack India, the world asks for restraint. But Israel gets carte blanche to strike sovereign nations? Double standards much? Either respect sovereignty or don't preach to others about it.
S
Sunita R.
This conflict will spike oil prices again - bad news for our economy already struggling with inflation. Our government should accelerate renewable energy plans and reduce dependence on Middle East oil. Jai Solar Power! ☀️
V
Vikram J.
India should stay neutral but vigilant. We have good relations with both Israel (defense partner) and Iran (Chabahar port). This is time for quiet diplomacy, not taking sides. Our national interest comes first - stable oil prices and security of Indian diaspora in Gulf.
N
Neha P.
The UN seems powerless as usual. Instead of emergency sessions that go nowhere, they need concrete action. Maybe time for India to push for Security Council reforms? We're the world's largest democracy and deserve a permanent seat to bring balanced perspectives.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50