NewKerala.com

Calcutta HC Demands Answers: Why West Bengal's Voter Revision Raises Questions

The Calcutta High Court has asked the Election Commission to explain why West Bengal needs this special voter revision. This comes after someone filed a petition asking for court supervision of the whole process. The court also decided not to give special protection orders for election officials facing threats. This voter list update is especially important since it's the first major one in nearly twenty years.

Key Points: Calcutta High Court Seeks ECI Affidavit on Bengal Voter Revision

  • Division bench directs ECI to submit affidavit by November 18 explaining revision necessity
  • Court refuses separate protection orders for threatened booth-level officers
  • Petitioner sought extension of revision period and court-monitored exercise
  • Special intensive revision marks first major voter list update since 2002
2 min read

West Bengal SIR exercise: Calcutta HC seeks ECI's affidavit

Calcutta High Court directs Election Commission to file affidavit explaining necessity of West Bengal's special voter revision exercise amid security concerns for officials.

"Since the state government was well aware of how to ensure the safety of its own employees, there was no need for a separate direction from the court - Calcutta High Court Division Bench"

Kolkata, Nov 6

A division bench of the Calcutta High Court on Thursday had sought an affidavit from the Election Commission of India (ECI) in a case on the ongoing special intensive revision conducted by the commission in West Bengal.

The division bench of the Calcutta High Court's Acting Chief Justice Sujay Paul and Justice Partha Sarathi Sen directed the commission to file the affidavit by November 18.

On October 31, the petition was filed at the Calcutta High Court seeking a court-monitored SIR exercise in West Bengal. In the petition, the petitioner had also sought the court's intervention so that the time period for conducting the revision exercise would be extended.

At the same time, the petitioner had prayed for the Calcutta High Court's direction to the ECI to give a detailed explanation on why the SIR exercise is necessary.

The matter came up for hearing on Friday and at the end of the hearing the division bench directed the ECI to file an affidavit on the commission's arguments in the matter by November 19.

During the hearing on Friday, the petitioner's counsel also sought specific directions from the court on the protection of booth-level officers (BLOs), considering that the BLOs are often being subjected to threats while carrying out the SIR exercise.

However, the division bench refused to give any separate direction on this issue of protection for the BLOs. The division bench observed that since the state government was well aware of how to ensure the safety of its own employees, there was no need for a separate direction from the court in the matter.

The first stage of the three-stage SIR in West Bengal has already started on November 4. In the first stage, the BLOs are going to the doorsteps of the voters with the enumeration forms.

The entire SIR exercise is expected to be completed by March, and soon after that, West Bengal is slated to go for the crucial assembly elections. The last time the SIR was conducted in West Bengal was in 2002.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
I'm concerned about the BLOs' safety. In West Bengal's political climate, these ground-level workers face genuine threats. The court should have given specific protection directions. This is disappointing.
A
Arjun K
Good move by the High Court. Electoral rolls need to be accurate for free and fair elections. Last SIR was in 2002 - that's 21 years ago! Definitely overdue for revision.
S
Sarah B
As someone who recently moved to Kolkata, I appreciate the door-to-door verification. Makes the voting process more accessible for new residents. Hope they complete it properly before elections.
V
Vikram M
The court is right to trust the state government with BLO protection. Constant judicial intervention isn't the solution. Let the administration do their job.
M
Michael C
November 18 deadline seems reasonable. Gives ECI enough time to prepare a proper affidavit. Hope this brings clarity to the whole process. Clean voter lists are essential for democracy.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50