Key Points

The West Bengal School Service Commission's recent notification for teacher recruitment is being challenged at the Calcutta High Court. A petition highlights changed weightage criteria, differing significantly from the 2016 process, potentially violating Supreme Court directives. Legal experts argue the changes could disadvantage fresh candidates, despite intentions to benefit the 2016 panel teachers. This comes amid ongoing legal complexities following a Supreme Court order canceling 25,753 school job appointments in the state.

Key Points: WBSSC Teacher Recruitment Challenged at Calcutta High Court

  • Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury to hear petition June 5
  • Changes in weightage criteria compared to 2016
  • Notification might disadvantage fresh candidates
3 min read

WBSSC's notification for fresh teachers' recruitment challenged at Calcutta HC

West Bengal's latest teacher recruitment notification faces challenge in Calcutta HC over altered criteria.

"The changed criteria would be disadvantageous for fresher candidates. - Legal Source"

Kolkata, June 3

The notification issued by the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) to fill vacant posts of teachers in state-run schools has been challenged at the Calcutta High Court on Tuesday.

The single-judge vacation bench of Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury admitted the petition. The matter is likely to come up for a hearing at his bench on June 5.

The petitioner claimed that certain points in the notification, especially those as regards to changed weightage criteria in the distribution of total marks in the recruitment process, violated the Supreme Court's directives on fresh recruitments.

The main ground on which the notification was challenged was that the weightage criteria in the distribution of total marks had changed from those in 2016.

As per the new notification issued last week, the written examination in the fresh recruitment process will carry 60 marks, as against 55 for the 2016 panel.

Secondly, the weightage criterion for educational qualification in the fresh recruitment process is just 10 as against 35 for the 2016 panel.

Most importantly, two new weightage criteria, each carrying 10 marks, "past teaching experience" and "lecture demonstration", have been introduced.

Soon after the notification was issued, several legal minds apprehended that the notification may face legal hurdles because of the changes in weightage criteria in total marks distribution.

Legal minds felt that while two new weightage criteria were introduced to give an advantage to the teachers from the 2016 panel who lost their jobs. They opined that the changed criteria would be disadvantageous for fresher candidates.

Bringing about changes in the weightage criteria was grossly illegal since the same weightage criteria, which applied to the 2016 panel, should also be there in the fresh recruitment process, they said.

Now their apprehensions have come true after a petition challenging the notification was filed at the Calcutta High Court, exactly on the points highlighted.

On April 3 this year, the Supreme Court's division bench of erstwhile Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar upheld a previous order by the Calcutta High Court's division bench of Justice Debangshu Basak and Justice Shabbar Rashidi cancelling 25,753 school jobs in West Bengal.

The Apex Court also accepted the observation of the Calcutta High Court that the entire panel of 25,753 candidates had to be cancelled because of the failure of the state government and the commission to segregate the "untainted" candidates from the "tainted" ones.

The state government and West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) had already filed review petitions at the Apex Court on this issue.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments for the article:
A
Arun K.
This is concerning. Changing weightage criteria mid-process seems unfair to fresh candidates. Education should be about merit, not favoring certain groups. Hope the court ensures justice for all applicants. 🤞
P
Priya M.
As someone who cleared WBSSC exams in 2019, I understand both sides. Experience should count, but 35 to 10 marks reduction in educational qualification weightage is too drastic. Need balanced approach.
R
Rahul S.
Another day, another WBSSC controversy! When will our education system become transparent? First the jobs scam, now this. Students suffer the most in this chaos. Shame!
S
Sunita G.
Lecture demonstration is actually a good addition - teaching is practical work after all. But why reduce weightage for qualifications? Both are important for quality education. Court should find middle path.
D
Debashish N.
The 2016 panel teachers who lost jobs deserve consideration, but not at the cost of fresh candidates. Government should create separate provisions for them instead of tweaking recruitment rules.
T
Tapan B.
This mess shows why we need national education service commission like UPSC. State-level commissions keep failing. Our children deserve better teachers and transparent selection process. #EducationReformNeeded

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50