VHP Demands Action: Why a Bengal Mosque Ceremony Sparks Legal Battle

The Vishva Hindu Parishad has formally written to West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. They are seeking legal action against suspended Trinamool Congress MLA Humayun Kabir. This follows a foundation stone-laying ceremony for a mosque named after Babur in Murshidabad district. The VHP alleges the event, held on December 6, was deliberately provocative and violates new penal laws.

Key Points: VHP Seeks Legal Action Against Suspended TMC MLA Humayun Kabir

  • VHP cites BNS Section 196 against promoting enmity between religious groups
  • Letter advises examining Section 299 for outraging religious feelings
  • Ceremony for 'Babri Mosque' held on December 6, a symbolic date
  • VHP argues naming mosque after Babur shows malicious intent, not accident
2 min read

VHP writes to Bengal CM seeking legal action against suspended Trinamool legislator Humayun Kabir

VHP writes to Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee, urging FIR against suspended TMC MLA Humayun Kabir for a mosque foundation ceremony citing BNS sections.

"It clearly is a malicious act likely to outrage Hindu religious beliefs. Thus it is an offence under Section 299 of BNS. - VHP Counsel Letter"

Kolkata, Dec 15

The Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), on Monday, has written a letter to the West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, seeking legal action against Humayun Kabir, the now-suspended Trinamool Congress legislator from Bharatpur Assembly constituency in minority-dominated Murshidabad district, for arranging the foundation stone laying ceremony of the Babri Mosque at Beldanga in the same district on December 6.

In the letter from the VHP Counsel and senior advocate Alok Kumar, a copy of which is available with IANS, the Chief Minister had been advised to direct her administration to examine the applicability of Section 196 and Section 299 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.

Section 196 relates to punishment for promoting enmity, hatred, or ill-will between different religious, racial, linguistic, or regional groups, or castes/communities, through speech, writing, signs, or electronic communication, and prohibits acts prejudicial to harmony.

On the other hand, Section 299 relates to punishment for deliberately and maliciously outraging the religious feelings of any class by insulting their religion or beliefs, using spoken/written words, signs, or electronic means.

In the letter, the VHP Counsel had also advised Chief Minister Banerjee to direct her administration to examine the possibility of registering a first information report (FIR) against Humayun Kabir and his associates involved with the arrangement of the foundation stone laying ceremony and act against them as per legal provisions.

The proposed mosque at Beldanga is supposed to be constructed in line with the original construction at Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh, which was demolished on December 5, 1992. That is precisely why Humayun Kabir chose December 6 of this year to organise the foundation stone laying ceremony.

In the letter to Chief Minister Banerjee, VHP had said that since Mughal emperor Babur had been historically associated with the destruction of Hindu religious sites, naming the proposed mosque at Beldanga after him, seen along with statements being made on this count, proved that the move was neither accidental nor incidental.

"It clearly is a malicious act likely to outrage Hindu religious beliefs. Thus it is an offence under Section 299 of BNS," the letter from the VHP Counsel said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
This is so disappointing. Why name it after Babur? It feels like a deliberate taunt. After the Ayodhya verdict, we should be moving towards peace and reconciliation, not creating new flashpoints. The timing on December 6th is clearly not a coincidence. 😞
R
Rohit P
As a citizen, I'm tired of politicians using religion for votes. Whether it's TMC, BJP, or anyone else. This MLA's suspension shows even his own party knew it was wrong. Let the law take its course without political interference.
S
Sarah B
While I understand the historical sensitivities, I respectfully disagree with the VHP's approach. Seeking legal action for a foundation stone ceremony sets a concerning precedent. In a diverse democracy, shouldn't the focus be on dialogue and education rather than criminalizing such acts? The path to harmony is through understanding, not just legal provisions.
V
Vikram M
Bengal has always been a land of syncretic culture. Such acts damage that fabric. The administration must act firmly to prevent any communal tension. Jai Hind.
K
Kavya N
It's very simple. Would anyone dare to do something similar for another religion? The double standards are glaring. The law (BNS sections 196 & 299) exists for a reason. Use it.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50