Key Points

The US State Department has reignited controversy by suggesting President Trump might mediate the Kashmir dispute, directly contradicting India's firm stance against third-party involvement. India's foreign ministry swiftly reiterated its position that Kashmir matters must be resolved bilaterally with Pakistan under the 1972 Tashkent agreement. The State Department spokesperson also wrongly credited US intervention for the recent India-Pakistan ceasefire, which India maintains resulted from its military success in Operation Sindoor. These claims come despite India's repeated denials of any external role in regional conflicts.

Key Points: US State Dept Repeats Trump Kashmir Mediation Claim Despite India's Denial

  • US State Dept suggests Trump may mediate Kashmir despite India's rejection
  • India cites 1972 Tashkent agreement for bilateral-only approach
  • Spokesperson credits US for India-Pak ceasefire despite denials
  • India attributes ceasefire to military success in Operation Sindoor
4 min read

US State Department rakes up Trump's Kashmir mediation claim despite India's firm dismissal 

US State Department revives Trump's disputed Kashmir mediation offer as India firmly reiterates bilateral-only stance on the issue

"We have a long-standing national position that any issues pertaining to Jammu and Kashmir have to be addressed bilaterally - Randhir Jaiswal"

Washington, June 11

Despite India's repeated dismissal of external involvement in the bilateral Kashmir dispute, US State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce raked it up, saying that it wouldn’t be a surprise if US President Donald Trump tried to mediate.

Replying to a question at her regular briefing on Tuesday, about what the reporter asserted was Trump’s offer to mediate, Bruce said, “Obviously, I can’t speak to what’s on the mind or the plans of the president”.

But she went on to say, “What I do know is that I think we all recognise that President Trump in each step that he takes, it’s made to solve generational differences between countries, generational war”.

“So, it doesn’t – it shouldn’t -- surprise anyone that he’d want to manage something like that” [the Kashmir dispute], she said.

Reiterating India’s stand on Kashmir, India’s External Affairs Ministry Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal has said, "We have a long-standing national position that any issues pertaining to the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir have to be addressed by India and Pakistan bilaterally”.

"That stated policy has not changed. The outstanding matter is the vacation of illegally occupied Indian territory by Pakistan," he said.

India's refusal to entertain third-party involvement in disputes with its neighbour is girded by the 1972 Tashkent agreement between their leaders.

Bruce said that the US reaffirmed “strong support of India in the fight against terrorism, and strategic partnership between those two countries” when the Indian Parliamentary delegation led by Sashi Tharoor met with Deputy Secretary Landau recently.

On Kashmir, Bruce added her own homage to Trump: “He seems very much to be – and not just seems but he is – has been the only one to bring certain people to the table to have conversations that nobody thought was possible”.

“While I can’t speak to his plans, the world knows his nature, and I can’t speak to any details of what he might have in that regard. You can call the White House. I have a feeling they would have plenty to say”, Bruce said.

She also repeated the claim – dismissed by India -- that the US had intervened to bring about a ceasefire in the four-day conflict last month between India and Pakistan.

“It is an exciting time that if we can get to a point in that particular conflict [between India and Pakistan], thank God but also thank Secretary [of State Marco] Rubio and President Trump and the Vice President [JD Vance]”, she said, pushing the assertions of US involvement.

Dismissing such claims, first made by Trump within hours of the cessation of hostilities and repeated by him and others, India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri has said that the US did not broker the India-Pakistan ceasefire.

The two countries decided at a bilateral level to stop the military actions, he told an Indian Parliamentary Committee.

Jaiswal said that it was India’s military might in Operation Sindoor – and not external intervention – that forced Pakistan to seek a ceasefire.

“Let me be clear, it was the force of Indian arms that compelled Pakistan to stop its firing”, he said.

He added, “You will of course appreciate that early on [May] 10th morning, we had mounted an extremely effective attack on key Pakistani Air Force bases. That was the reason they were now willing to stop firing and military action”.

A reporter asked Bruce whether Pakistan had given any assurances that it would take action against terrorists when its delegation led by former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari met with Under Secretary for Political Affairs Allison Hooker recently.

She said tersely, “I am not going to discuss the details of those conversations”.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
Why does the US keep pushing this mediation narrative? India has made its position crystal clear - Kashmir is a bilateral matter. Trump should focus on America's own issues rather than interfering in ours. Our armed forces have shown they can handle Pakistan's mischief without any "help".
P
Priya M.
It's amusing how the US claims credit for our military successes 🤦‍♀️ Operation Sindoor was 100% Indian planning and execution. Pakistan came crawling because of our strength, not because of some imaginary US intervention. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
A
Amit S.
While I appreciate US-India strategic partnership, they need to respect our sovereignty. This constant meddling in India-Pakistan matters is counterproductive. The Tashkent agreement exists for a reason - let South Asian nations resolve their issues themselves.
N
Neha T.
The US State Department spokesperson sounds like she's reading from Trump's campaign script! Where's the professionalism? India has handled Pakistan brilliantly through diplomatic and military means. We don't need foreign mediators, thank you very much.
S
Sanjay R.
Notice how they're quick to take credit for ceasefire but silent on Pakistan's terrorism? Typical double standards. India should continue strengthening ties with other global powers who actually respect our position on Kashmir.
M
Meena V.
As an Indian, I'm proud of our government's firm stance. But we must be careful - the US is an important partner. Maybe our diplomats could explain our position more clearly to prevent such misunderstandings in future. Cultural differences in communication styles matter in diplomacy.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50