Sat, 23 May 2026 · LIVE
Updated Sep 21, 2025 · 10:14
USA News Updated Sep 21, 2025

US' state California bans masks for immigration agents during operations

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a pioneering set of laws aimed at protecting immigrants from federal enforcement tactics. The No Secret Police Act prevents law enforcement from wearing masks during operations, requiring clear identification. These bills directly challenge federal immigration enforcement practices, particularly those implemented during the Trump administration. The legislation represents a significant stance by California to safeguard immigrant communities' rights and dignity.

California, Sep 21

California Governor Gavin Newsom has announced that he has signed a package of laws aimed at protecting immigrants in the US state, with the No Secret Police Act being a first-in-the-nation measure that prohibits officers from wearing masks.

Speaking at a high school in Los Angeles on Saturday (local time), Newsom said he signed five bills into law. The No Secret Police Act broadly bars federal and local law enforcement officers from wearing face masks while performing their duties.

Newsom also signed a bill requiring state and federal law enforcement officers to identify themselves by displaying their badge numbers or names while on duty, unless working undercover, reports Xinhua news agency.

The other three bills signed Saturday restrict Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) access to schools and daycare facilities, ban hospitals and health care providers from sharing sensitive information or allowing agents to enter emergency rooms without a warrant, and require family notification when agents appear on school campuses.

"It's like a dystopian sci-fi movie," Newsom said at the event. "Unmarked cars, people in masks, people quite literally disappearing."

"No due process, no rights. Immigrants have rights, and we have the right to stand up and push back," he added.

This law package was signed during US President Donald Trump's wide-ranging deportation program. The governor later posted on X that the new laws were "a direct response" to Trump's "lawless immigration raids and arrests in California."

California Democrats began drafting the immigration-related bills soon after Trump took office this January. Their efforts intensified after aggressive immigration crackdowns in Southern California sparked weeks of protests in Los Angeles and led to a National Guard deployment.

"All of this legislative resistance is to protect Angelenos from their own federal government. That is profound," Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said at Saturday's event, where she joined Newsom and other local Democratic leaders.

ICE has faced criticism from residents and communities in California for allowing agents to wear face-covering masks and plain clothes, citing threats to officers and their families.

In a statement Saturday, Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security Tricia McLaughlin denounced the new laws signed by Newsom as "despicable" and "a flagrant attempt to endanger our officers."

Legal experts said the measures may offer limited protection to immigrants and will likely face constitutional challenges from the federal government.

Kevin Johnson, an immigration law professor and former dean of the UC Davis School of Law, stated that the legislation may have a marginal impact on federal enforcement operations.

He noted that a 2018 California law restricting immigration arrests at superior court buildings did not stop the Trump administration from detaining people at courts this year.

"The federal government is going to continue doing what it's doing, in one form or another," Johnson said. "I do think the legislation gives some hope and optimism to communities that feel under fire, vulnerable and basically hated by the federal government."

— IANS

Reader Comments

Rahul R

While I support immigrant rights, I'm concerned about officer safety. There should be a balance - maybe visible identification badges while allowing some protective gear when needed. Both sides have valid concerns.

Sarah B

As someone who lived in California, this is exactly why I love that state. Protecting vulnerable communities is essential. The part about restricting access to schools and hospitals is particularly important - those should be safe spaces for everyone.

Arjun K

Interesting development. In India we've seen how important it is for law enforcement to be identifiable. This might set a precedent for other states. The constitutional challenges will be worth watching though.

Michael C

The professor is right - this might not stop federal operations but it gives hope to communities. Sometimes symbolic resistance matters as much as practical impact. California standing up for its values.

Nisha Z

Good step! Nobody should live in fear of being taken away by unidentified people. Basic human rights include knowing who is enforcing the law and why. Hope other states follow California's lead.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked