Key Points

US lawmakers introduced the No Adversarial AI Act to block Chinese-controlled AI from federal systems, citing espionage risks. The bipartisan bill targets firms like DeepSeek, requiring strict oversight of AI procurement. Lawmakers warn adversarial AI could compromise national security and sensitive data. The legislation allows exceptions for research but mandates transparency in government AI usage.

Key Points: Bipartisan No Adversarial AI Act Targets Chinese AI in Federal Systems

  • Bipartisan bill bans Chinese AI like DeepSeek from federal use
  • Mandates updated list of adversarial AI technologies
  • Exceptions allowed for research and national security
  • Addresses future AI threats from hostile regimes
4 min read

US lawmakers unveil Bipartisan 'No Adversarial AI Act' to block Chinese-Controlled AI from federal systems

US lawmakers propose banning Chinese-controlled AI like DeepSeek from government systems, citing national security risks and data privacy concerns.

"AI controlled by foreign adversaries risks national security, data integrity, and government operations. – Raja Krishnamoorthi"

Washington DC, June 26

Ranking Member Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) and Chairman John Moolenaar (R-MI) of the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party have put forth the No Adversarial AI Act, a bipartisan measure aimed at safeguarding federal agencies from the dangers associated with artificial intelligence technologies that are under the control of foreign adversaries, specifically the People's Republic of China (PRC), as reported by the Democrats Select Committee on the CCP (DSCCCP).

This legislation, co-sponsored by Representatives Ritchie Torres (D-NY) and Darin LaHood (R-IL) in the House and introduced by Senators Rick Scott (R-FL) and Gary Peters (D-MI) in the Senate, requires that the Federal Acquisition Security Council create and frequently update a list of AI technologies developed by adversarial entities.

DeepSeek serves as an example, having documented connections to the Chinese Communist Party and its intelligence network, and its privacy policy clearly states that user data from the United States is stored in China.

In April, Ranking Member Krishnamoorthi and Chairman Moolenaar unveiled the results of their investigation into DeepSeek, which included a recommendation to Congress to "impose a federal procurement ban on AI models originating from the PRC, including a prohibition on their use on government devices," as articulated in the DSCCCP release.

The No Adversarial AI Act would prohibit US government agencies from acquiring or utilizing AI products created by firms like DeepSeek unless a specific exception is provided for research, testing, or national security needs, requiring notification to Congress.

This legislation also addresses adversarial AI technologies that may arise in the future, which could represent a similar or even more significant threat to federal systems and data, according to the DSCCCP release.

"Artificial intelligence controlled by foreign adversaries represents a direct risk to our national security, data integrity, and government operations," stated Ranking Member Krishnamoorthi.

"We must not permit hostile regimes to embed their software in our most vital systems. This bipartisan measure will establish a clear barrier between foreign adversary AI and the U.S. government, safeguarding our institutions and the American populace. Chinese, Russian, and other adversarial AI systems have no place on government devices and certainly should not be entrusted with government data," as quoted in the DSCCCP release.

"We are currently in a new Cold War, with AI emerging as the strategic technology at its core," remarked Chairman Moolenaar.

"The CCP does not innovate; it steals, scales, and undermines. From intellectual property theft to chip smuggling to the integration of AI into surveillance and military platforms, the Chinese Communist Party is hastening efforts to weaponize this technology. We must draw a definitive line: systems used by the U.S. government cannot be powered by tools designed to serve authoritarian objectives."

"The Communist Chinese regime will resort to any tactic to spy, steal, and weaken the United States, and as AI technology progresses, we must enhance our efforts to protect national security and prevent adversarial regimes from exploiting technology against us," expressed Senator Scott.

"Given the clear evidence that China can access US user data on AI platforms, it is reckless for our federal agencies to utilise these hazardous systems and expose our government to Beijing's influence. Our No Adversarial AI Act will mitigate this direct threat to our national security and ensure that sensitive data remains secure from enemy hands."

"Artificial intelligence holds immense promise for our economy and society, but it also presents real security risks when leveraged by foreign adversaries," said Senator Peters.

"This legislation helps safeguard US government systems from AI developed by foreign adversaries that could compromise our national security or put Americans' data at risk. It's a smart, focused step to ensure our government technology infrastructure keeps pace with the evolving threats we face while still allowing room for scientific research, evaluation, and innovation. I'm proud to support this effort to protect Michiganders' personally identifiable information from bad actors who could exploit their data housed on government systems," the DSCCCP release quoted.

The bill empowers the federal government to identify, exclude, and remove adversarial AI from its systems while enhancing transparency and oversight of federal AI.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

Here are diverse Indian perspective comments for the article:
A
Arjun P.
This is a smart move by US lawmakers. We've seen how Chinese tech companies operate - they're basically arms of the CCP. India should implement similar safeguards for our government systems. Data sovereignty is non-negotiable in today's world. 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
While I understand security concerns, completely banning foreign AI might slow down technological progress. Many Indian startups use Chinese AI tools for cost-effective solutions. Maybe balanced regulation instead of outright bans?
R
Rahul K.
China's AI dominance is a wake-up call for India! We need to invest heavily in our own AI research and development. Remember how we missed the semiconductor bus? Can't afford to repeat that mistake with AI. Jai Hind!
S
Sunita T.
Interesting to see bipartisan support on this issue in US. In India, we often politicize such matters. National security should be above party politics. Hope our leaders take note and work together on tech sovereignty.
V
Vikram S.
The US-China tech war continues... While this legislation makes sense, I worry it might lead to more protectionism globally. India should focus on becoming an AI leader rather than just choosing sides. Our IITs and startups have great potential!
N
Neha D.
Data security is crucial, but let's not forget many Indian apps use Chinese AI in backend. Blanket bans might hurt our digital economy. We need smart, nuanced policies - not knee-jerk reactions. The US can afford this, can we?
K
Karan J.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50