Key Points

A significant group of over 1000 current and former US Department of Health and Human Services employees have formally requested Robert F Kennedy Jr's resignation. Their letter highlights concerns about politicization of health policy and the controversial removal of CDC director Susan Monarez. The employees argue that Kennedy's leadership is compromising national health standards and scientific integrity. Many signatories remained anonymous, expressing fears of potential professional retaliation.

Key Points: Kennedy HHS Resignation Demand by 1000+ Health Workers

  • 1000+ HHS workers demand Kennedy's resignation
  • CDC director Susan Monarez's controversial removal sparks protest
  • Health workers criticize political interference in health policy
  • Employees fear potential retaliation for signing letter
2 min read

US: Health workers call for resignation of Secretary Kennedy

Over 1000 HHS employees call for Kennedy's resignation, citing risks to national health and CDC leadership challenges

"We believe health policy should be based in strong, evidence-based principles rather than partisan politics. - HHS Employee Letter"

Washington, Sep 3

Over 1000 current and former employees of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have called for the resignation of Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr after removal of the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Susan Monarez and other actions which they said are "compromising the health of the nation."

In a letter sent to Kennedy and members of Congress on Wednesday, a group of former and current employees urged US President and US Congress to appoint a new Secretary of Health and Human Services, one whose qualifications and experience ensure that health policy is informed by independent and unbiased peer-reviewed science.

The letter stated, "Should he decline to resign, we call upon the President and US Congress to appoint a new Secretary of Health and Human Services, one whose qualifications and experience ensure that health policy is informed by independent and unbiased peer-reviewed science. We expect those in leadership to act when the health of Americans is at stake," top US political website The Hill reported.

The letter builds on an effort that started in August when HHS employees requested Kennedy to make more efforts to protect health professionals after the shooting at the CDC headquarters in Atlanta on August 8.

An additional 887 HHS staff have signed on the letter after its release on August 20, according to the organising group Save HHS. The group said Kennedy has not given a response to the letter while HHS issued a statement, accusing them of politicising the tragedy.

The new letter mentions about ouster of CDC director Susan Monarez and the subsequent resignations of four top agency leaders in response to her removal, The Hill reported. The HHS staff also criticised Kennedy for appointing "political ideologues who pose as scientific experts and manipulate data to fit predetermined conclusions" and for continuing to verbally target his own agency employees.

The letter stated, "We believe health policy should be based in strong, evidence-based principles rather than partisan politics. But under Secretary Kennedy's leadership, HHS policies are placing the health of all Americans at risk, regardless of their politics."

The HHS employees stated that they signed the letter in their personal capacities and some opted to remain anonymous "out of well-founded fear of retaliation and threats to personal safety."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
When 1000+ health professionals speak up, the government should listen. Science should guide health policy, not political agendas. This affects global health security too 🌍
M
Michael C
As someone working in healthcare, this is alarming. Manipulating data to fit political narratives? That's dangerous for public health. The US should set better examples for the world.
A
Ananya R
The fact that employees fear retaliation says everything! Health decisions must be based on evidence, not ideology. Hope this gets resolved soon for everyone's safety 🤞
S
Sarah B
While I support scientific integrity, maybe we should also consider that leadership changes sometimes bring fresh perspectives. Not defending anyone, but there might be another side to this story?
V
Vikram M
This is why we need strong institutions that can withstand political pressure. CDC is a global health leader - its independence must be protected at all costs! 💪

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50