NewKerala.com

Key Points

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy delivered a stark message at the UN General Assembly. He questioned the organization's ability to resolve global conflicts, pointing to ongoing crises. Zelenskyy stated that in reality, weapons, not international law, determine which nations survive a war. He also criticized the fundamental structure of the UN Security Council, where Russia's veto power blocks action against its own aggression.

Key Points: Zelenskyy Questions UN Relevance Citing Weapons Over Law

  • Zelenskyy argues weapons are the decisive factor for survival in conflict, not legal frameworks
  • He questions the UN's effectiveness, citing failures in Gaza, Syria, and Ukraine
  • The Ukrainian leader expresses frustration with the UN Security Council's structure and Russia's veto power
  • His comments highlight obstacles in securing US military aid as the war continues
2 min read

At UNGA, Zelenskyy questions UN's effectiveness, says weapons decide who survives

At UNGA, Zelenskyy says weapons decide survival, not international law, and criticizes the UN Security Council where Russia holds veto power.

"Not international law, not cooperation. Weapons decide who survives. - Volodymyr Zelenskyy"

New York, September 24

The 80th United Nations General Assembly's General Debate entered its second day on Wednesday, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy using his opening remarks to question the relevance of the UN in addressing global crises.

Zelenskyy asked, "What can anyone living through war really expect from the UN or the global system for decades? Just statements and statements." He pointed to Gaza, Syria, and the Russia-Ukraine conflicts, where the international community had failed to provide adequate support.

The Ukrainian leader underscored that the decisive factor in the war with Russia would be weapons rather than legal frameworks. "If a nation wants peace, it still has to work on weapons. It's sick, but that's the reality," he said. "Not international law, not cooperation. Weapons decide who survives."

His comments come as Ukraine continues to face obstacles in securing approved military assistance from the United States. Zelenskyy also expressed visible frustration with the structure of the UN Security Council, where Russia holds permanent membership and veto power.

"International law doesn't work fully, unless you have powerful friends who are truly willing to stand up for it," he added.

Russia holds veto authority in the United Nations Security Council as one of its five permanent members, a privilege created under the UN Charter in the aftermath of World War II.

As one of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (P5), Russia holds the right to veto. This authority enables any of the P5--China, France, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Russia--to single-handedly block substantive resolutions, even those addressing global peace and security.

Russia has exercised this power frequently, using it to halt resolutions on its war in Ukraine as well as the humanitarian crisis in Sudan. Historically, Moscow and its predecessor, the Soviet Union, have resorted to the veto more often than any other permanent member.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
While I understand his frustration, this "weapons over diplomacy" approach worries me. As a country that believes in Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (world is one family), we should push harder for peaceful solutions. The UN needs reform, not abandonment.
A
Aditya G
He's absolutely right about the veto power issue. How can there be justice when the accused is also the judge? India has been advocating for UNSC reforms for years. This conflict proves why change is necessary. 🕊️
S
Sarah B
As someone living in Delhi, I see parallels with how smaller nations often get bullied. International law only works when powerful countries want it to work. Zelenskyy's speech was brutally honest about global power dynamics.
K
Karthik V
The UN was created after WWII for a different world order. Today's multipolar world needs updated institutions. India's balanced approach in this conflict shows that middle powers have important roles to play in global peace.
M
Michael C
While his frustration is understandable, focusing only on weapons sends the wrong message. As an expat in Mumbai, I've seen how India manages complex international relationships through diplomacy. Military strength is important, but so is dialogue.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50