Key Points

UK officials are concerned about Chinese-made drones surveying critical infrastructure like power stations and water reservoirs. The National Grid and Thames Water use DJI drones despite MI5 warnings over data risks. The US has blacklisted DJI, citing military links and potential security vulnerabilities. Chinese laws could compel companies to share sensitive data with Beijing, raising national security fears.

Key Points: UK Alarmed by Chinese Drones Surveying Critical Infrastructure

  • DJI drones used for UK National Grid inspections despite security warnings
  • US blacklisted DJI over military ties in 2022
  • MI5 urged caution on drones from high-risk nations
  • Chinese law may force firms to share sensitive data
2 min read

UK officials alarmed by Chinese-made drones surveying critical infrastructure despite security warnings

UK officials warn Chinese-made drones pose security risks as they survey power grids, nuclear plants, and water supplies despite MI5 advisories.

"Chinese drones may exhibit vulnerabilities that could allow data theft or enable network breaches. – US Federal Bureau of Investigation"

London, April 17

UK government officials have expressed private worries that drones manufactured in China are being utilised to capture high-resolution imagery of essential national infrastructure locations in the UK, contrary to guidance provided by the nation's security services, as reported by The Financial Post.

National Grid Plc, which manages the country's electricity and gas distribution networks, employs drones produced by Shenzhen-based SZ DJI Technology Co. to record videos, take photographs, and capture thermal images of its electricity substations, according to details shared on its website as recently as September.

The Financial Post also indicated that DJI drones have been utilized for surveying the construction of Electricite de France SA's Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant, inspecting solar energy facilities, and by Thames Water for overseeing reservoirs and water supplies.

The use of these drones occurs despite a 2023 warning from the UK's National Protective Security Authority (NPSA), a division of the domestic security service MI5, advising British organizations responsible for sensitive sites to exercise caution when employing drones "produced in countries with coercive data sharing practices," referencing China. Furthermore, in 2022, the US Department of Defense placed DJI on a blacklist of Chinese companies with military connections.

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation has cautioned that drones manufactured in China "present a considerable risk to critical infrastructure," given that they "may exhibit vulnerabilities that could allow data theft or enable network breaches."

Meanwhile, the advisory from the UK's NPSA to British firms states: "The foremost defense for organisations intending to utilise unmanned aerial systems (UAS) might be to limit UAS and their corresponding component procurement from nations that pose a security threat."

Employing Chinese-made drones at vital locations in the UK carries risks because Chinese national security legislation can obligate its companies to share information with the government, according to a UK government official who spoke anonymously due to the sensitive nature of the matter, as highlighted in The Financial Post report.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah K.
This is really concerning! We're basically handing over sensitive infrastructure data to potential adversaries. Why aren't we using British or European-made drones instead? 🇬🇧
J
James P.
DJI makes great drones, but national security should come first. Maybe we need stricter regulations about where this data gets stored and processed?
M
Mohammed A.
Work in energy sector. The cost difference between Chinese and UK drones is massive. Until govt provides subsidies for alternatives, companies will keep using DJI. 🤷‍♂️
E
Emma L.
While I understand the security concerns, the article doesn't provide evidence of actual data breaches. We should be careful but not paranoid. The tech is incredibly useful for maintenance.
T
Tom R.
Respectful criticism: The article leans heavily on unnamed officials and US warnings. Would be good to hear DJI's response or see some technical analysis of these alleged vulnerabilities.
P
Priya S.
This is why we need to invest more in our own tech sector! Can't keep relying on foreign manufacturers for critical infrastructure needs. 🚀

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50