Key Points

The Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) has approached the Supreme Court challenging the Madras High Court's Special Investigation Team probe into the Karur stampede. The party alleges potential bias in the state police investigation and seeks an independent inquiry by a former apex court judge. The tragic event occurred during an event organized by actor Vijay, resulting in 41 deaths and multiple injuries. The Supreme Court hearing on October 10 will determine the future course of the investigation.

Key Points: Vijay's TVK Seeks SC Probe into Karur Stampede Tragedy

  • TVK challenges state police-led SIT investigation
  • Seeks former Supreme Court judge to lead independent probe
  • Event drew 27,000 people instead of expected 10,000
  • Majority of victims were women and children from western Tamil Nadu
3 min read

TVK moves SC for former SC judge-led independent probe into Karur stampede

TVK challenges Madras HC's SIT investigation, demands independent judicial inquiry into deadly event that claimed 41 lives during actor Vijay's event

"The court could not remain a 'mute spectator' - Justice N. Senthilkumar, Madras High Court"

Chennai, Oct 8

The Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) of Tamil actor C. Joseph Vijay has approached the Supreme Court seeking an independent inquiry by a former apex court judge into the September 27 stampede at Tamil Nadu's Karur that left 41 people dead and several others injured.

The party, through its Secretary Aadhav Arjuna, has filed a petition challenging the Madras High Court's October 3 order appointing a Special Investigation Team (SIT) headed by Inspector-General of Police Asra Garg to probe the tragedy.

The plea, mentioned before Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, is expected to be taken up for hearing on Friday (October 10).

On the same day, the court will also hear a separate appeal challenging the Madras HC Madurai bench's refusal to transfer the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

In its petition, the TVK argued that despite the High Court itself having "serious reservations" about the impartiality of the state police, it had constituted an SIT comprising only senior Tamil Nadu officers.

"The petitioner-party as well as its leaders are prejudiced by the order which appoints an SIT composed solely of officers of the State Police, especially in the face of the observations of the Hon'ble High Court expressing its dissatisfaction with the independence of state police and its conduct, and prejudicial factual findings against the petitioner," the plea stated.

The party alleged the possibility of a "pre-planned conspiracy" behind the deadly stampede and insisted that a probe conducted by the state police could not be fair or independent.

It also objected to what it termed "unverified and prejudicial observations" made against the party and its leadership by the high court bench of Justice N. Senthilkumar while ordering the SIT probe, including remarks that TVK functionaries had "fled from the scene" and "abandoned" victims.

According to the petition, TVK leaders and cadre had, in fact, "immediately coordinated relief and medical aid" when reports of people fainting emerged.

However, the single judge bench had called the stampede a "huge man-made disaster" and expressed strong disapproval of the party's conduct, stating that the court could not remain a "mute spectator".

The September 27 event at Velusamypuram on the Karur-Erode Highway drew nearly 27,000 people -- almost three times the anticipated turnout of 10,000. The crowd reportedly surged forward and broke past barricades around 8 p.m. after a long wait for Vijay's arrival on stage, triggering chaos. Most of the victims were women and children who had travelled from across western Tamil Nadu to see the popular actor-turned-politician.

Following the tragedy, Tamil Nadu Police booked several TVK office-bearers, excluding Vijay, under charges including culpable homicide not amounting to murder, criminal negligence and misrepresentation of expected crowd numbers.

Meanwhile, a division bench of Justices M. Dhandapani and M. Jothiraman of the Madurai Bench had on the same day dismissed other pleas, including one by the BJP's Uma Anandan, seeking a CBI probe, observing that the investigation was still at an early stage.

The bench also directed the state government not to permit public meetings on National and State Highways until standard operating procedures for such events are framed.

With the TVK now pressing for a retired Supreme Court judge to oversee the probe, the Supreme Court hearing on October 10 is expected to determine whether the SIT-led investigation will continue or an independent inquiry will be ordered.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
TVK is absolutely right to demand an independent probe. When state police themselves are investigating their own lapses in crowd control, how can we expect impartiality? Justice must be served for those poor women and children.
A
Arjun K
While I understand the need for fair investigation, let's not forget the primary responsibility lies with the organizers. Expecting 10,000 but getting 27,000 shows poor planning. Both state government and TVK share blame here.
S
Sarah B
The High Court's ban on public meetings on highways until SOPs are framed is a much-needed step. We've seen too many such tragedies across India. Public safety should be non-negotiable.
K
Karthik V
As someone from Tamil Nadu, I feel both political parties and administration failed our people. The victims were mostly women and children who just wanted to see their favorite actor. This should never happen again. 😔
M
Michael C
The Supreme Court's intervention is crucial here. When there are allegations of "pre-planned conspiracy" and questions about police impartiality, only an independent probe can bring closure to the grieving families.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50