Key Points

Former diplomat KP Fabian strongly refutes Trump's claim that Iran is the "most dangerous regime," pointing to US and Israeli military actions instead. He highlights Iran's lack of aggression over the past two decades compared to frequent conflicts initiated by Israel. Fabian also questions the feasibility of regime change in Iran, noting increased public support for Ayatollah Khamenei amid external threats. The escalating conflict, including recent US-Israel strikes, has intensified global tensions over Iran's nuclear program.

Key Points: Former Diplomat Fabian Calls Trump's Iran Regime Claim Wrong

  • Fabian argues Iran hasn't attacked anyone in 20 years unlike Israel and the US
  • Questions Netanyahu's aggression while defending Iran's stance
  • Criticizes Trump's misleading timeline on strikes
  • Doubts regime change in Iran due to national unity
4 min read

Trump's description of Iran as most dangerous regime absolutely wrong: Former diplomat Fabian

Ex-diplomat KP Fabian disputes Trump's "most dangerous regime" label for Iran, citing US and Israel's aggression instead.

"Trump’s description of Iran as the most dangerous regime is absolutely wrong. In fact, it’s America who has been attacking. – KP Fabian"

New Delhi, June 22

Former Diplomat KP Fabian said that it is not accurate to describe Iran as a dangerous regime as it has over the past over two decades not attacked anyone. Fabian's remarks come in the wake of the US and Israel's strikes on three nuclear strikes in Iran.

"Well, let me ask the question, which is the most dangerous regime? Is it Netanyahu or Iran? Netanyahu has started this aggression. And Israel has carried out so many wars. Whom did Iran attack in the last 20 years? Nobody. So Trump's description of Iran as the most dangerous regime is absolutely wrong. In fact, it's America who has been attacking" Fabian told ANI.

Noting that it was America who attacked Iraq and Afghanistan, Fabian said, "Trump's words have to be taken with a slight pinch of salt."

Regading the Sunday morning strikes on Fordow, Nutanz and Isfahan- facilities in Iran, Fabian said, "This was to be expected... When Trump said within two weeks, most people misunderstood that he would give two weeks for Europeans and others to find a diplomatic way out. No, Trump was trying to mislead. He did it two days time. Except that if we follow the correct usage of the phrase within two weeks, that is the upper limit. So I can say, let's meet within two weeks. And then still I can propose I can meet you two days later."

Speaking on the issue of regime change in Iran, Fabian noted, "I doubt it because there's a lot of confused talk about regime change. What we have to do is to make a distinction between regime change and regime collapse. There can be a regime collapse, but that is followed by anarchy and civil war. If you are thinking of a regime change, that happened in 2003 in Iraq. American boats were on the ground. Saddam Hussein fell and then they put up a set of Iraqis of their choice. That is regime change. Now, I am of the view that Israeli and American troops will not be on the ground in Iran. That will be absolutely suicidal because the casualties will be very high and Trump will not have it. In other words, popular support for Ayatollah Khamenei, Is it going down or is it increasing? Well, reports suggest that though many Iranians were rebelling against Ayatollah Khamenei, now they have gathered around him, but that's what happens in every country. When there is an external enemy, the people rally around the government. So I don't expect either regime collapse and therefore nor any regime change."

Trump announced on Sunday that US had conducted "massive precision strikes" on the nuclear sites in Iran. In his remarks after the strike, the US President warned Iran of retaliation if peace is not achieved soon.

The underground site at Fordow and the larger Natanz plant were Iran's two primary uranium enrichment facilities, out of which Natanz had already been hit by Israel with smaller weapons earlier in the week, the New York Times reported.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that history will record the US President who "acted to deny the world's most dangerous regime, the world's most dangerous weapons."

Iran in a statement acknowledged that the sites had been hit and called it "savage aggression--an act in violation of international laws", stressing particularly on the NPT. It alleged "indifference and complicity" by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of indifference and complicity and said that it expects the international community to condemn these actions.

The conflict between Israel and Iran entered its ninth day on Saturday, with the US now joining in support of Israel. The conflict started after Israel, on June 13, launched a massive airstrike on Iranian military and nuclear sites, dubbed "Operation Rising Lion."

In response, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched a large-scale drone and missile operation, 'Operation True Promise 3', targeting Israeli fighter jet fuel production facilities and energy supply centres.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul S.
Fabian makes valid points but misses Iran's proxy wars in Middle East. Their support to groups like Hezbollah makes them dangerous, even if not directly attacking. India should maintain balanced relations with both US and Iran - our energy security depends on it 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
As an Indian, I'm more concerned about how this conflict will affect oil prices. Petrol at ₹100+ is already burning holes in our pockets. The government should speed up renewable energy projects to reduce dependence on Middle East oil. #EnergySecurity
A
Arjun K.
The West always creates problems then acts surprised when things go wrong. Remember Iraq? Now same playbook with Iran. India should stay neutral and focus on Chabahar port - it's crucial for our Afghanistan trade and countering China's influence.
S
Sunita P.
While I don't support Trump's actions, Iran isn't exactly peaceful either. They've been funding militias across Middle East. But violence won't solve anything - dialogue is the only way. India's traditional non-aligned stance serves us well in such situations. 🙏
V
Vikram J.
The real danger is nuclear proliferation in our neighborhood. Pakistan already has nukes, Iran trying to get them. India must strengthen its defense while continuing peaceful nuclear program. Our scientists made us proud with Pokhran tests - we need that self-reliance!
N
Neha T.
Why is no one talking about the human cost? Innocent Iranians will suffer the most. As someone who remembers the 1991 Gulf War petrol queues in Delhi, I hope our government has contingency plans for NRIs in Gulf and oil supplies. Jai Hind!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50