Key Points

A US federal court has declared Trump-era tariffs on foreign trade partners unlawful, stating such actions exceed emergency powers and require Congressional approval. In response, Ajay Srivastava from the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) advises India to reassess its free trade agreement negotiations with the US. Srivastava warns against trade deals influenced by threats or legal inconsistencies, highlighting previous tariff measures as violations of WTO rules. With India and the US close to signing a Bilateral Trade Agreement, this ruling adds complexity to the evolving economic landscape.

Key Points: Trump Tariff Overturned GTRI Urges Caution in India-US Trade Deal

  • US court declares Trump tariffs unlawful impacting FTA talks
  • GTRI suggests India focus on legal compliance in trade negotiations
  • India could be disadvantaged by hasty commitments to US interests
2 min read

Trump tariff declared unlawful; India must reassess US trade deal: GTRI

Federal court rules Trump tariffs unlawful; GTRI advises India to rethink US trade deal strategy.

"India must pause and reassess its negotiation strategy before committing to an FTA. - Ajay Srivastava/GTRI"

New Delhi, May 29

After a federal court of the United States struck down a reciprocal tariff announced by US President Donald Trump, the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said that India should proceed cautiously in its ongoing Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations with the US.

A Manhattan-based federal court on May 28 struck down Trump's move to impose reciprocal tariffs on the trading partners of the US and ruled that he can't use emergency power to impose tariffs on foreign countries; it has to come from Congress.

The order of the court determined that the tariffs, including those introduced under emergency economic powers, were unlawful.

Analysing the impact of the ruling on Trade negotiations, Ajay Srivastava, founder of GTRI, said that India should resist any agreement shaped by threats or based on unlawful measures.

Srivastava said that Trump-era tariffs violate World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules as well as the domestic laws of the US as confirmed by the federal court.

"With the Trump tariffs standing on shaky legal ground, India must pause and reassess its negotiation strategy before committing to an FTA that could disproportionately favour U.S. interests," said Srivastava in a statement.

ANI on May 23 reported through government sources that India and the United States are poised to sign the first tranche of the much-anticipated Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) before July.

The India-US trade deal would mark a significant milestone in economic relations between the two big economies, potentially opening new avenues for bilateral commerce and investment.

In 2024-25, for the fourth consecutive year, the US was India's largest trading partner, with bilateral trade valued at USD 131.84 billion. India had a trade surplus of USD 41.18 billion in goods with the US in 2024-25.

After the landmark ruling of the US federal court, the stock markets globally reacted positively, with excitement seen in major Asian markets of Japan and Korea. Japan's Nikkei and Korea's Kospi surged two per cent after the ruling.

In reaction, the Indian stock market benchmark Sensex at BSE also jumped over 500 points but lost steam soon.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments for the article:
R
Rahul K.
This shows why India must be careful with US trade deals. We've seen how unpredictable their policies can be with changing administrations. Our negotiators should ensure any agreement benefits Make in India first 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
Good analysis by GTRI. With $41 billion trade surplus, we actually have strong bargaining power. Why rush into a deal that might compromise our farmers and small industries? Let's negotiate from position of strength.
A
Arjun S.
The US market is important but we shouldn't bend backwards to please them. Look at how China protects its interests! We need similar strategic thinking. Maybe focus more on EU and African markets too.
S
Sunita P.
As someone working in exports, I've seen how sudden US tariff changes hurt our businesses. This court ruling is a reminder that we need stable, long-term agreements - not ones that change with every President.
V
Vikram J.
While being cautious is good, we shouldn't overreact. The US remains our biggest trade partner. A balanced deal could boost IT, pharma and manufacturing exports. But yes, must protect our agriculture sector at all costs.
N
Neha T.
Interesting how markets reacted positively! Shows global business prefers stable trade rules. India should use this momentum to push for better terms. Maybe include easier H1B visa access in the negotiations? 😊

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50