Trump Targets Foreign Proxy Advisors: How a 90% Market Duopoly Influences Your 401(k)

President Trump has signed a new executive order focusing on foreign-owned proxy advisory firms. The order asserts that two companies have excessive control over corporate governance in America. It directs multiple federal agencies to conduct regulatory reviews and enforcement actions. The move highlights a significant political clash over the role of ESG principles in investing.

Key Points: Trump Executive Order Targets Foreign-Owned Proxy Advisory Firms

  • Order targets ISS and Glass Lewis for controlling over 90% of the US proxy advisor market
  • Accuses firms of prioritizing political agendas like ESG over investor returns
  • Directs SEC to review all rules and enforce anti-fraud provisions against proxy advisors
  • Orders FTC and Department of Labor to investigate competition and fiduciary conduct
3 min read

Trump signs executive order targeting foreign-owned proxy advisors

President Trump signs an executive order directing sweeping reviews of foreign-owned proxy advisors ISS and Glass Lewis, citing outsized influence over US corporate governance.

"Unbeknownst to many Americans, these firms advise clients on how to vote the enormous numbers of shares their clients hold and manage on behalf of millions of Americans. – Executive Order"

Washington, Dec 12

Asserting that two foreign-owned firms exert outsized influence over corporate governance in the United States, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing sweeping regulatory and enforcement reviews of the proxy advisory industry.

The order, titled Protecting American Investors from Foreign-Owned and Politically-Motivated Proxy Advisors, focuses on Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. and Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC, which it says “control more than 90 percent of the proxy advisor market” and play “a significant role in shaping the policies and priorities of America’s largest companies through the shareholder voting process.”

“Unbeknownst to many Americans,” the order states, these firms advise clients on how to vote “the enormous numbers of shares their clients hold and manage on behalf of millions of Americans in mutual funds and exchange traded funds,” with clients’ holdings often constituting “a significant ownership stake in the United States’ largest publicly traded companies.” Their clients, it adds, “often follow the proxy advisors’ advice.”

As a result, the order says, proxy advisors “wield enormous influence over corporate governance matters, including shareholder proposals, board composition, and executive compensation,” as well as over “capital markets and the value of Americans’ investments more generally, including 401(k)s, IRAs, and other retirement investment vehicles.”

The executive order signed by Trump accuses the firms of using that influence to “advance and prioritize radical politically-motivated agendas — like ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ and ‘environmental, social, and governance’ — even though investor returns should be the only priority.”

It cites support for shareholder proposals requiring companies to conduct “racial equity audits” and “significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” and notes that one firm “continues to provide guidance based on the racial or ethnic diversity of corporate boards.”

The order also raises “significant concerns about conflicts of interest and the quality of their recommendations,” concluding that the United States “must therefore increase oversight of and take action to restore public confidence in the proxy advisor industry, including by promoting accountability, transparency, and competition.”

As such, Trump directs the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission to review “all rules, regulations, guidance, bulletins, and memoranda relating to proxy advisors” and consider revising or rescinding those “inconsistent with the purpose of this order,” particularly where they implicate “diversity, equity, and inclusion” and “environmental, social, and governance” policies.

The SEC is also asked to consider changes to shareholder proposal rules, including Rule 14a-8, and to enforce federal securities laws’ anti-fraud provisions for “material misstatements or omissions contained in proxy advisors’ proxy voting recommendations.”

It instructs the Federal Trade Commission, in consultation with the Attorney General, to review ongoing state antitrust investigations and to investigate whether proxy advisors engage in “unfair methods of competition or unfair or deceptive acts or practices” that harm US consumers, including by “failing to adequately disclose conflicts of interest” or “providing misleading or inaccurate information.”

Further, the Department of Labor is directed to review and potentially revise guidance under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, including whether proxy advisors should be treated as fiduciaries and whether they act “solely in the financial interests of plan participants,” with a mandate to enhance transparency around the use of proxy advisors in pension and retirement plans.

Proxy advisory firms play a central role in global capital markets, including for large US-listed companies with significant foreign ownership and international investor participation.

Their recommendations are closely watched by institutional investors worldwide, including those with exposure to US equities from emerging markets such as India.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While oversight is important, calling ESG and DEI agendas "radical" and politically motivated seems like a stretch. Many Indian companies are now embracing ESG principles because it's good for long-term business, not just politics. This order feels more ideological than practical.
V
Vikram M
Finally! Someone is looking at this. These proxy advisors have too much sway. In India too, we see foreign funds pushing certain agendas on our companies. Investor returns should be the primary focus, not western social agendas. Good step by Trump.
P
Priya S
As someone who works in corporate governance in Mumbai, this is a big deal. The ripple effects will be felt here. Many Indian institutional investors rely on these firms' research for their US investments. Increased scrutiny on their conflicts of interest is a welcome move for global markets.
R
Rohit P
The order makes a valid point about transparency, but completely dismissing diversity and climate goals is short-sighted. In India, we understand that a diverse board can lead to better decisions. And climate risk *is* investment risk. Hope the SEC review is balanced.
M
Michael C
Interesting to see this from an Indian perspective. Our mutual funds and pension funds are increasingly investing abroad. If these advisors are giving biased guidance, it affects the savings of common Indians too. The fiduciary review by the Department of Labor is crucial.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50