Key Points

The Indian government has firmly denied any external mediation during recent military tensions with Pakistan. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri provided a detailed briefing to the Parliamentary Standing Committee, clarifying the nature of Operation Sindoor and rejecting claims of nuclear signaling. The government emphasized that all communication channels remained professional and bilateral decisions were made independently. The committee unanimously supported Misri's transparent approach during this sensitive geopolitical moment.

Key Points: Jaishankar Clarifies Sindoor Operation as Misri Refutes Trump Claims

  • Foreign Secretary rejects Trump's ceasefire narrative
  • Operation Sindoor remained entirely conventional
  • Communication channels with Pakistan remained open
  • Parliamentary committee supports government's stance
3 min read

Trump didn't broker 'understanding', Jaishankar's words on 'Operation Sindoor' twisted: Govt tells MPs

Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri addresses Pakistan tensions, denies Trump's mediation and clarifies Operation Sindoor details in Parliamentary briefing

"He simply wanted to step into the spotlight - Government Source on Trump's intervention"

New Delhi, May 19

Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, in a closed-door briefing to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs, clarified that India did not carry out any strikes on Pakistan's nuclear infrastructure during Operation Sindoor. According to sources present at the meeting, the government made it clear that the operation remained entirely conventional in nature, and there was no nuclear signalling or threats from the Pakistani side during the recent military confrontation.

The briefing was held against the backdrop of heightened tensions between India and Pakistan, following the Pahalgam terror attack and India's retaliatory Operation Sindoor, which targeted terror infrastructure across the Line of Control. The committee, chaired by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, questioned the Foreign Secretary on several key aspects of the operation and its strategic implications.

In response to inquiries about whether India suffered any aircraft losses during the operation, the government stated that such details fall under operational secrecy and cannot be disclosed publicly.

Members also sought clarification on an X post by US President Donald Trump, in which he implied that his intervention helped broker a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Sources said the government firmly denied any such role, stating that the ceasefire was a bilateral decision between New Delhi and Islamabad. According to Misri, Trump did not coordinate with India or seek permission to make public statements, sources said. "He simply wanted to step into the spotlight," the panel was reportedly told.

There were also questions raised regarding External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar's earlier statement, which some interpreted as contradictory to the government's military position. The Foreign Secretary clarified that the minister's comment referred specifically to the first phase of Operation Sindoor, when India conducted strikes on nine terror camps on the night of May 6-7. Misri, according to sources, said that Pakistan had been informed about those strikes after they occurred, and that Jaishankar's statement was being misrepresented.

Sources further revealed that the committee unanimously passed a resolution condemning the remarks targeting Foreign Secretary Misri and his family. Members expressed full support for Misri and praised his handling of the situation during a sensitive time.

During the meeting, Misri also offered a frank assessment of India's diplomatic position with Pakistan. He stated that relations have remained poor since 1947 and are unlikely to improve in the foreseeable future. Speaking on other geopolitical dynamics, Misri commented that India has historically never had strong ties with Turkey, and Ankara's stance during the recent crisis has no real trade or diplomatic consequence, sources said.

The committee was told that communication channels between India and Pakistan's military leadership, particularly at the DGMO (Director General of Military Operations) level, remained open and active during the crisis. These lines of communication played a key role in avoiding further escalation and stabilising the situation post-strike.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
Glad the government clarified that Trump had no role in brokering peace. We don't need foreign powers meddling in India-Pakistan matters. Our armed forces and diplomats handled this professionally. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
While I support our forces, I wish the government would be more transparent about aircraft losses. Families of our brave soldiers deserve to know the truth. This secrecy hurts public trust.
A
Amit S.
Trump always tries to take credit where none is due! 😂 Our DGMO-level communication with Pakistan worked effectively without any American intervention. This shows maturity in our military diplomacy.
N
Neha T.
The resolution supporting FS Misri is heartening. Our civil servants shouldn't be dragged into political mudslinging, especially during sensitive operations. Hope this sets a good precedent.
V
Vikram J.
Operation Sindoor was a masterstroke! But I'm concerned about media twisting EAM Jaishankar's words. Our ministers' statements should be crystal clear to avoid such confusion. National security isn't a matter for vague comments.
S
Sunita R.
The frank assessment about India-Pak relations is refreshing. After 75 years, we need to accept that normal ties aren't possible until Pakistan stops its terror policy. Let's focus on strengthening ourselves rather than chasing peace mirages.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50