Trump administration urges Supreme Court to allow deportations under alternative laws

ANI April 20, 2025 245 views

The Trump administration is urging the Supreme Court to allow deportations of Venezuelan migrants under alternative immigration laws after the court temporarily blocked removals. The Justice Department argues that the government should still be able to deport some migrants under less controversial statutes. The White House defended its actions, stating it would use all legal means to remove potential threats. This legal clash underscores Trump's aggressive approach to immigration enforcement.

"President Trump promised the American people to use all lawful measures to remove the threat of terrorist illegal aliens." – White House Statement
Washington DC, April 20: After the US Supreme Court temporarily barred the deportation of migrants, President Donald Trump's administration has urged the apex court to allow the use of alternative laws to remove a group of Venezuelan migrants detained in Texas, CNN reported.

Key Points

1

Justice Dept argues for deportations under alternative laws

2

Supreme Court temporarily blocked removals

3

White House defends legality of actions

4

Dispute highlights Trump's hardline immigration stance

Following the Supreme Court's order, the US Justice Department argued that the justices should deny the request to halt deportations under the controversial wartime authority provided by the Alien Enemies Act.

The Justice Department further urged the Supreme Court to provide clarity that it may remove at least some of the same migrants under less controversial immigration laws.

The Supreme Court's order did not distinguish between deportations under the Alien Enemies Act and other laws, CNN reported.

The court said, "The government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this court."

Earlier, the White House said in a statement Saturday morning that "President Trump promised the American people to use all lawful measures to remove the threat of terrorist illegal aliens, like members of (Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua), from the United States."

"We are confident in the lawfulness of the Administration's actions and in ultimately prevailing against an onslaught of meritless litigation brought by radical activists who care more about the rights of terrorist aliens than those of the American people," said press secretary Karoline Leavitt, as reported by CNN.

Previously, a Federal Judge in Washington DC told lawyers for migrants in Texas who believed the Trump administration was about to swiftly deport them under the Alien Enemies Act that he did not have the power to pause the deportations, even though he was concerned about the administration's actions, CNN reported.

The dispute between SC and the administration reflects Donald Trump's aggressive stance on deportations.

Reader Comments

M
Maria K.
This is such a complex issue. While I understand the need for border security, using wartime laws for deportations seems extreme. There must be a better way to handle immigration that respects human rights.
J
James T.
Finally some action! We need strong immigration policies to protect our country. The Supreme Court shouldn't interfere with lawful deportations. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
S
Sarah L.
The Alien Enemies Act was passed in 1798... is this really the best tool we have in 2024? Our immigration system needs comprehensive reform, not just enforcement.
R
Robert G.
I'm conflicted. While I support legal immigration, the administration's approach seems heavy-handed. There should be more nuance in these cases.
A
Amanda P.
The press secretary calling concerned citizens "radical activists" is unprofessional. We can debate policy without demonizing people who care about human rights. πŸ‘Ž
T
Thomas W.
Interesting legal strategy by the DOJ to pivot to other immigration laws. Shows they recognize the Alien Enemies Act might not hold up in court. Smart move.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags:
You May Like!