Trinamool nominates Abhishek Banerjee for Operation Sindoor multi-party delegations

IANS May 20, 2025 269 views

The Trinamool Congress has strategically replaced Yusuf Pathan with Abhishek Banerjee in the multi-party Operation Sindoor delegation after internal disagreements. Mamata Banerjee's leadership directly influenced the decision, highlighting the party's desire to control its political representation. The BJP has criticized the move, suggesting it reveals weakness in the Trinamool's stance against terrorism. This episode underscores the complex political dynamics within West Bengal's current political landscape.

"His presence will not only reflect Bengal's firm stand against terror but also strengthen India's collective voice on the global stage" - Trinamool Congress Statement
Kolkata, May 20: A day after withdrawing its lawmaker Yusuf Pathan from the multi-party delegations on Operation Sindoor over "lack of consultation", the Trinamool Congress on Tuesday announced party General Secretary and MP Abhishek Banerjee as its nominee.

Key Points

1

Mamata Banerjee personally intervened to replace Yusuf Pathan

2

Abhishek Banerjee nominated for multi-party anti-terrorism delegation

3

BJP criticizes Trinamool's delegation selection process

4

Political tension emerges over representation strategy

"We’re delighted to share that our Chairperson Smt @MamataOfficial has nominated Nat'l GS Shri @abhishekaitc to represent Trinamool Congress in the all-party delegation for India’s global outreach against terrorism," the party said in a statement.

The Trinamool also said that Abhishek Banerjee’s inclusion brings both conviction and clarity to the table at a time when the world must unite to confront the growing threat of terrorism.

"His presence will not only reflect Bengal’s firm stand against terror but also strengthen India’s collective voice on the global stage," the statement read.

Initially, cricketer-turned-politician Pathan was nominated as the sole representative of the Trinamool in the multi-party delegations.

However, the party leadership, especially Chief Minister, Mamata Banerjee, took a strong objection to the selection and claimed that the Union government announced Pathan’s name after contacting him personally and without informing the party leadership and the Chief Minister beforehand.

Both the Chief Minister and Abhishek Banerjee, on Monday, questioned how the Union government and the BJP could unilaterally decide who would represent Trinamool in the multi-party delegations. Thereafter, Pathan's name was withdrawn, and finally, on Tuesday, Abhishek Banerjee’s name was nominated for the panel.

The Trinamool’s decision to withdraw Pathan’s name from the multi-party delegation attracted scathing criticism. BJP’s Information Technology Cell Chief and the party’s central observer for West Bengal, Amit Malviya, said that Mamata Banerjee’s decision to force Pathan to withdraw from the multi-party delegation sent a subliminal message that she and her party were unwilling to speak out against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism.

"Mamata Banerjee represents the worst kind of politics, and unfortunately, West Bengal is bearing the brunt of it. Let us not forget that a hostile demographic shift is staring the state in the face," Malviya said.

Leader of the Opposition in the Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari, said that the decision to withdraw the name of Pathan proved that Mamata Banerjee’s leadership represented a dangerous brand of politics that puts regional and personal interests above the nation, and her refusal to take a firm stand against terrorism only emboldens anti-national elements.

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
Why is everything made into a political drama? Operation Sindoor is about national security, not party politics. Both TMC and BJP should focus on the bigger picture - fighting terrorism together. This back-and-forth only weakens India's position globally. 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
Abhishek Banerjee is definitely a more experienced choice than Yusuf Pathan for such an important delegation. But the way this was handled shows poor coordination between state and center. Terrorism affects all Indians - can't we have better teamwork on this?
A
Arjun S.
Malviya's comments about "hostile demographic shift" are completely unnecessary and divisive. This should be about uniting against terrorism, not creating more divisions. Bengal has always stood strong against terror - remember how we dealt with Naxals?
S
Sunita R.
As a Bengali, I'm proud to see our representative in this important delegation. But Didi should understand that sometimes we need to rise above state politics for national interest. Hope Abhishek Banerjee will represent India first, then Bengal.
V
Vikram J.
The center should have consulted TMC before announcing names. Basic courtesy matters in federal politics. But TMC's reaction seems exaggerated too. At the end, what matters is having strong representation against terrorism from all parties. Jai Hind!
N
Neha P.
Why bring Pakistan into every discussion? The focus should be on how India presents a united front globally. Whether it's Abhishek or Yusuf, what matters is the message we send to the world about zero tolerance for terrorism. Let's not dilute that with petty politics.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags: