Key Points

TRAI has formally responded to DoT's request for reconsideration of telecom network authorisation terms. The regulator revised its earlier recommendations after stakeholder consultations. The exchange stems from initial requests made under the TRAI Act and the 2023 telecom law. The updated response is now publicly available on TRAI's website.

Key Points: TRAI Responds to DoT Back-Reference on Telecom Network Authorisations

  • TRAI submits formal response to DoT's July 2025 back-reference
  • DoT sought reconsideration of February 2025 recommendations
  • Stakeholder consultations shaped revised telecom network terms
  • Clarifications align with Telecommunications Act 2023 provisions
2 min read

TRAI issues formal response to DoT's back-reference on recommendations

TRAI addresses DoT's reconsideration request on telecom network terms under the 2023 Act, clarifying recommendations after stakeholder consultations.

"TRAI addressed each observation and provided clarifications or revised positions where necessary. – Ministry of Communications"

New Delhi, August 13

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has issued its formal response to the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) on matters relating to the Terms and Conditions of Network Authorisations under the Telecommunications Act, 2023. This follows a back-reference from the DoT dated July 3, 2025, seeking reconsideration of certain recommendations TRAI had earlier submitted on February 17, 2025.

According to a press release from the Ministry of Communications, the July 3 back-reference was sent under the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997. The DoT had indicated that some of the recommendations might not be accepted as proposed or would require modification, prompting the regulator to revisit its earlier stance.

This exchange stems from an initial request on July 26, 2024, when the DoT, under the TRAI Act, asked the regulator to suggest terms and conditions, including applicable fees, for granting authorisations to establish, operate, maintain, or expand telecommunication networks under the 2023 law. An additional request followed on October 17, 2024, asking TRAI to examine authorisation provisions for satellite communication networks under the Telecommunications Act, 2023.

TRAI, after consulting stakeholders and industry representatives, submitted its detailed recommendations on February 17, 2025. These covered various aspects of network authorisation, aiming to align regulatory requirements with the provisions of the new telecommunications framework.

The Ministry of Communications noted that the government's prima facie observations on certain points led to the July back-reference. In its latest reply, TRAI addressed each of these observations and provided clarifications or revised positions where necessary. The regulator's response has now been made publicly available on its official website.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
As someone working in telecom sector, I appreciate TRAI's stakeholder consultations. But why does it take so many back-and-forths between DoT and TRAI? This delays implementation of important policies affecting digital India vision.
A
Aman W
Satellite communication networks are the future! Good to see TRAI focusing on this. Hope the regulations don't kill innovation with too much bureaucracy. We need to compete with global players like Starlink.
P
Priya S
While the process seems thorough, I'm concerned about small telecom operators. Hope TRAI has considered their challenges too in these recommendations. The big players always dominate policy making 😕
V
Vikram M
The 2023 Act was supposed to simplify telecom regulations, but all this back-referencing shows implementation is still stuck in old bureaucratic ways. Need more efficiency in decision making!
N
Nisha Z
As a law student, I find this regulatory process fascinating! The checks and balances between TRAI and DoT show how complex telecom governance is. Would love to see more public participation in these consultations though.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50