NewKerala.com

Key Points

Champak magazine's publisher has sued BCCI for trademark infringement over the name of its IPL robotic dog. The Delhi High Court declined immediate relief but sought stronger evidence from the magazine. BCCI's lawyer argued that "Champak" is a generic term used by multiple brands. The case will be heard again in July as both sides prepare stronger arguments.

Key Points: Champak Magazine Sues BCCI Over IPL Robotic Dog Name

  • Champak publisher alleges BCCI unfairly benefits from trademark
  • Court seeks concrete proof before granting relief
  • BCCI argues name is generic and used widely
  • Next hearing scheduled for July 9
2 min read

Trademark tussle: Children's magazine 'Champak' takes BCCI to court over its robotic dog's name

Champak publisher takes BCCI to court for trademark infringement over IPL robotic dog's name, Delhi High Court seeks stronger evidence.

"Champak is a flower's name and used by other brands, not just the magazine – J Sai Deepak, BCCI's lawyer"

New Delhi, April 30

A legal battle has begun in Delhi High Court over the name "Champak," given to the robotic dog introduced in the 2025 Indian Premier League (IPL).

The publisher of the children's magazine Champak, Delhi Press Patra Prakashan, has filed a lawsuit against the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), claiming trademark infringement.

The Delhi High Court's bench of Justice Saurabh Banerjee has issued a notice regarding the case, with the next hearing scheduled for July 9. However, the court declined to grant immediate relief to the magazine's publishers.

The robotic dog camera, developed by wTVision in collaboration with Omnicam and BCCI, was introduced to enhance match broadcasting. Champak magazine's representatives argue that BCCI's use of the name unfairly benefits them in a commercial setting. The judge asked for clear proof of this claim, rather than just arguments.

BCCI's lawyer, Senior Advocate J Sai Deepak, defended the name, stating that "Champak" is a flower's name and is used by other brands and characters, not just the magazine.

He also pointed out that media reports linked the robotic dog to characters from "Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah."

The court acknowledged the dispute but stated that it was too early to decide on an injunction. The matter will be heard again on July 9, as both sides prepare to present stronger arguments.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya M.
Champak magazine has been part of our childhood memories! BCCI should have been more considerate before using the name for commercial purposes. It's not just about a flower name - there's emotional value attached to it for generations of Indians. 🤔
R
Rahul K.
This is such a silly case wasting court's time. Champak is a common flower name and BCCI has every right to use it. Next we'll have people trademarking "rose" and "lily"? The magazine should focus on improving its content instead.
A
Ananya S.
As someone who grew up reading Champak, I understand the publisher's concern. But BCCI's argument holds merit too. Maybe they could have added something to differentiate, like "IPL Champak" or "Champak Cam"? Compromise would be better than legal battle.
V
Vikram J.
Both sides are being stubborn. BCCI could have avoided this by doing proper trademark research before naming. And Champak magazine is overreacting - no one will confuse a robotic dog with their magazine! Focus on more important issues, both of you.
S
Sunita P.
Interesting case! If Champak wins, it could set precedent for other brands using common names. But if BCCI wins, it might encourage big corporations to ignore smaller brands' trademarks. Courts need to balance this carefully. 🧐
K
Karan D.
Honestly, I didn't even know Champak magazine still existed! Maybe this lawsuit is their way of getting free publicity. Smart move actually - their name is now trending thanks to IPL's popularity. 😄

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50