BJP Slams DMK Over Temple Dispute: Demands Minister's Apology Amid Religious Row

The BJP has launched a strong attack on the DMK government over a temple dispute in Madurai. The party is demanding a public apology from a state minister for court arguments it says insult Hindu sentiments. This controversy involves a legal fight about lighting a lamp on a hill considered sacred to Lord Murugan. The BJP claims the DMK's stance is consistently anti-Hindu and warns it will impact upcoming elections.

Key Points: BJP Criticises DMK Over Thiruparankundram Issue, Seeks Minister's Apology

  • BJP demands public apology from HR&CE Minister for remarks on Murugan temple
  • Controversy centers on legal battle over lamp-lighting at Thiruparankundram hill
  • Party accuses DMK of distorting facts and undermining Sanatan Dharma
  • BJP warns of political consequences from alleged anti-Hindu government stance
3 min read

TN BJP criticises DMK over Thiruparankundram issue, demands Minister's apology

BJP attacks DMK government over Thiruparankundram hill lamp-lighting case, alleging anti-Hindu stance and demanding HR&CE Minister's public apology.

"The DMK government has repeatedly taken positions that are 'anti-Hindu' and in violation of Article 25 of the Constitution. - A.N.S. Prasad, BJP Tamil Nadu Spokesperson"

Chennai, Dec 16

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has launched a sharp attack on the ruling DMK government over its stand in the Thiruparankundram hill lamp-lighting case, accusing it of hurting Hindu religious sentiments and undermining Sanatan Dharma.

The party has demanded a public apology from Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Minister P.K. Sekar Babu for what it described as "insulting remarks" against Tamil God Murugan.

The controversy arose during the hearing of appeals filed by the Executive Officer of the Thiruparankundram Temple and the Madurai District Collector before a Division Bench of the Madras High Court comprising Justices G. Jayachandran and C.V. Karthikeyan.

The appeals challenged an earlier order of Single Judge Justice S. Swaminathan, which permitted the lighting of a lamp at the summit of Thiruparankundram hill as part of religious practice.

Arguing on behalf of the Tamil Nadu government, counsel submitted that a Dargah exists near the temple and that permission for lighting the lamp should be granted only by the temple administration. It was also contended that there was no historical evidence to establish the existence of a Deepa Stambham (lamp pillar) on the hill.

The BJP alleged that these arguments amounted to a distortion of historical facts and were driven by ulterior motives.

The party also took strong exception to submissions made by senior counsel N. Jothi, appearing for the HR&CE Department, who reportedly stated that although Lord Murugan has two consorts, tradition permits the lighting of a lamp only at one place and not at two locations.

According to the BJP, such remarks belittle the faith of devotees and undermine the religious significance of Thiruparankundram, one of the six revered abodes of Lord Murugan.

In a statement issued by BJP Tamil Nadu spokesperson A.N.S. Prasad, the party said devotees and spiritual organisations were pursuing their rights through constitutional and legal means, placing their trust in the judiciary. However, it accused the DMK government of repeatedly taking positions that were "anti-Hindu" and in violation of Article 25 of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion.

The BJP further alleged that the DMK leadership, including Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, had consistently made statements critical of Sanatan Dharma, hurting the sentiments of the people of Tamil Nadu.

The party warned that such actions would have political consequences and claimed that public anger would reflect in the upcoming elections.

Demanding accountability, the BJP insisted that Minister Sekar Babu take moral responsibility for the remarks made in court and issue a public apology to devotees and the people of Tamil Nadu.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As someone from Madurai, Thiruparankundram is a very sacred place for us. The arguments presented in court about "no historical evidence" for the lamp pillar are disrespectful to centuries of local tradition and belief. The government should facilitate faith, not create legal hurdles. 🙏
R
Rahul R
While I'm not a BJP supporter, I have to agree on this one. The counsel's remark about Lord Murugan's consorts and lamp lighting was completely uncalled for and shows a lack of sensitivity. The Minister should clarify the government's position and ensure such arguments aren't made in the future.
S
Sarah B
Watching from abroad, it's concerning to see religious sentiments become a political football. The court is the right place to settle this, but the language used by government lawyers should be factual and respectful to all parties involved, not inflammatory.
K
Karthik V
The DMK's stance seems contradictory. They talk about social justice but then their lawyers make arguments that hurt the religious feelings of a large community. This isn't about politics, it's about basic respect. Hope better sense prevails.
A
Anjali F
The issue is being blown out of proportion by both sides. The original court order allowed the lamp. The government appealed, which is its right. Now, instead of letting the High Court decide, we have political statements flying everywhere. Let the judiciary do its job.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50