Madras HC's Stern Order: Why Top TN Officials Must Appear in Contempt Case

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has taken a firm stance in a contempt case. It has ordered the Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary and the ADGP to appear via video conference. This comes after the state failed to implement a court order allowing a ceremonial lamp lighting. The court rejected the government's request to wait for a Supreme Court appeal.

Key Points: Madras HC Directs TN Chief Secretary, ADGP to Appear in Contempt Case

  • Court directs top state officials to appear over non-compliance of festival lighting order
  • State government cited law and order concerns for not implementing the directive
  • Contempt petition filed against district collector, police commissioner, and temple officer
  • Judge rejects state's plea for adjournment, impleads Union Home Ministry in case
2 min read

Tiruppurakundram contempt case: Madras HC directs TN Chief Secy, ADGP to appear on Dec 17

Madras High Court orders Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary and ADGP to appear over contempt plea regarding Karthigai Deepam festival lighting order non-compliance.

"The question before the court was why the earlier order was not implemented. - Justice G. R. Swaminathan"

Chennai, Dec 9

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday directed the Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary and the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP) to appear through video conference on December 17 in connection with a contempt of court petition linked to the lighting of Karthigai Deepam atop the Thiruparankundram hill.

The order was passed by Justice G. R. Swaminathan while hearing a contempt plea filed over the non-implementation of his earlier directive to permit the lighting of the ceremonial lamp at the Deebathun Pillar site on the hill during the recent Karthigai Deepam festival.

The controversy arose after the Tamil Nadu government, led by the DMK, declined to implement the single judge’s order, citing law and order concerns.

Following this, Ram Ravikumar, founder of the Hindu Tamil Party, filed a contempt petition against the Madurai District Collector, the Police Commissioner and the temple’s Executive Officer for failing to carry out the court’s directions.

Earlier, the state government had moved the Supreme Court of India, challenging the single judge’s order. However, the appeal is yet to be taken up for hearing.

When the contempt petition came up for hearing again on Tuesday, Additional Advocate General Ravindran, along with senior advocates Veerakathiravan and Vikas Singh, appeared for the state. The government submitted that since the matter was pending before the Supreme Court, the High Court should wait for the outcome of the appeal.

The state argued that the appeal concerns the correctness of the order itself and questioned how interim compliance could be insisted upon when the legality of the direction was under challenge. It further contended that temple-related actions cannot be mandated arbitrarily and that the issue also involved serious law and order considerations.

Rejecting the plea for adjournment on that ground, Justice Swaminathan observed that the question before the court was why the earlier order was not implemented. In his afternoon order, he directed the Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary and the ADGP to appear via video conference on December 17.

The judge also ordered that the Union Home Ministry be impleaded as a respondent in the case.

Further, the Madurai Deputy Police Commissioner was directed to file a detailed explanation on the steps taken and the reasons for non-compliance with the original court order.

The case is expected to come up for further hearing next week.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As a Tamilian, I feel this is being politicized. Karthigai Deepam is a sacred festival. The government should facilitate traditions, not create hurdles. Hope the Supreme Court hears this soon.
V
Vikram M
While I support religious freedom, the state's primary duty is maintaining peace. If intelligence suggested a real threat, their caution is understandable. The court summoning the top officials seems a bit harsh in this scenario.
S
Sarah B
Interesting case on federalism and judicial authority. The state appealing to the Supreme Court shows the legal complexity. The High Court is right to ask why its order wasn't followed in the interim period.
A
Aman W
This is pure vote bank politics. The DMK government is scared of offending a certain section. Justice Swaminathan is taking a strong stand for the rule of law. Jai Hind!
K
Kavitha C
The involvement of the Union Home Ministry is a significant development. It shows the court is treating the non-compliance very seriously. Let's see what explanation the police provide.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50