Key Points

UP Minister Sanjay Nishad clashed with Mayawati over the recent railway fare hike, pointing out her government’s frequent tariff increases. He defended the current hike as necessary for safety and infrastructure improvements. Mayawati criticized the move as anti-public, while Nishad stressed long-term benefits. The Railways plans to use the funds for modernization and better amenities.

Key Points: Sanjay Nishad Counters Mayawati Over Railway Fare Hike Criticism

  • Nishad highlights past fare hikes under Mayawati’s rule
  • Defends current hike for infrastructure upgrades
  • Emphasizes safety and time efficiency
  • Railways to modernize stations with new funds
2 min read

In her time, fares rose frequently: Sanjay Nishad hits back at Mayawati over rail tariff hike remarks

UP Minister Sanjay Nishad defends rail tariff hike, citing past frequent increases under Mayawati’s tenure while promising better safety and facilities.

"In their time, fares increased frequently, every year from 2004 to 2024, with Mayawati Ji’s support. – Sanjay Nishad"

New Delhi, July 2

Uttar Pradesh Minister Sanjay Nishad on Wednesday hit back at Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) President Mayawati for her criticism of the recent hike in railway passenger fares, stating that tariff increases were far more frequent during her government.

Mayawati had earlier slammed the Centre for the fare hike that came into effect on July 1, calling it “against the general public interest” and demanding its immediate rollback.

She termed it a “business-minded decision” that ignored the welfare-oriented objective of the Constitution.

Responding sharply, Minister Nishad said, “In their time, fares increased frequently, every year from 2004 to 2024, with Mayawati Ji’s support. My government did not increase fares for so long. So, as of now, to increase facilities, a fare has been increased after a long time.”

While acknowledging that fare hikes should ideally be avoided, Nishad defended the move by pointing to the need for upgraded infrastructure, enhanced safety, and time efficiency.

“The government needs to provide better facilities and ensure safety. Security is important, time is valuable, and saving time is crucial. If we reduce time and assure safety, money is required,” he explained.

The fare revision includes increased platform ticket prices and adjustments to certain passenger fare categories.

The Ministry of Railways has clarified that the funds generated will be used to modernise railway stations, enhance passenger amenities, and boost overall safety systems.

Mayawati, in her statement, argued that the decision would burden common people and accused the government of prioritising profit over public welfare. But Nishad countered that the current administration had held off on fare increases for years while steadily working to improve services.

“People value their time and safety. To deliver both, investment is necessary. The fare hike is a step towards a more efficient and secure railway system,” Nishad said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As a daily commuter, I don't mind paying slightly more if it means better facilities and safety. But government should ensure transparency in how these funds are actually utilized. Too many projects remain incomplete.
A
Aman W
Both sides are playing politics. The real issue is - why can't we have world-class railways without burdening common people? Look at Japan's efficiency! Our leaders should focus on solutions rather than blame games.
S
Sarah B
Visiting India from Canada, I must say the railway fare hike seems minimal compared to what we pay back home. But the service quality needs to match the price increase. Cleanliness and punctuality should be top priorities.
K
Karthik V
The platform ticket price increase from ₹10 to ₹30 is too steep! Many poor people use stations just for drinking water or toilets. Government should have differential pricing for basic amenities.
N
Nisha Z
While I understand the need for funds, why not first cut down on wasteful expenditure? So many VIP trains run almost empty. Reduce corruption and inefficiency before asking common people to pay more.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50