Key Points

The Supreme Court has implemented a strict ban on photography and videography within its high security zone. This decision comes amid recent bomb threats that targeted high courts across India. Media personnel must now conduct all interviews and live broadcasts from a designated low security area. Violators of these new guidelines face serious consequences including one-month access restrictions.

Key Points: Supreme Court Bans Phone Photos Videos High Security Zone

  • New circular bans all photography and videography using mobile phones in high security zone
  • Media must conduct interviews and live broadcasts only in designated low security zone
  • Violating media personnel face one-month access restriction to high security area
  • Bar associations directed to take action against advocates violating the rules
2 min read

Supreme Court bans taking photos, making videos in its high security zone

Supreme Court prohibits mobile photography and videography in high security zone following recent bomb threats to courts. New guidelines impose one-month access ban for violators.

"In case of violation of the guidelines by media personnel, their access to the High Security Zone of the Supreme Court may be restricted for a period of one month - Supreme Court Circular"

New Delhi, Sep 12

Close to the recent bomb threats to courts, the Supreme Court has prohibited photography and videography using mobile phones inside its high security zone, an official said on Friday.

A circular dated September 10 issued by the Supreme Court has given security personnel the right to disallow any individual, staff member, advocate or others from taking photographs or making videos inside the high security zone.

Regulating media activities on the top court’s main premises, the circular said, the media personnel shall conduct interviews and live broadcasting of news at their designated location near the lawn in the low security zone.

“In case of violation of the guidelines by media personnel, their access to the High Security Zone of the Supreme Court may be restricted for a period of one month,” said the circular.

The Supreme Court also directed the Bar Association or State Bar Council to take appropriate action if the rules and regulations are violated by any Advocate, Litigant, Intern or Law Clerk.

“Any violation of the above guidelines by staff of the Registry will be viewed seriously, and in case of other stakeholders, their concerned head of department shall be requested to take disciplinary action against the violator as per their rules and regulations,” said the circular.

The apex court’s circular imposing photography curbs came into the public domain on a day when hoax bomb calls to the Delhi High Court and the Bombay High Court caused nationwide panic.

Work was paralysed as courtrooms were vacated in both the High Courts, and bar associations requested lawyers to shift to safety.

The Delhi High Court received the bomb threat via email, forcing all benches to stop the hearings and evacuate the court premises.

The Delhi Police rushed a bomb detection and disposal team, and the area was cordoned off before the threat was declared a hoax.

The threat, sent by an email under the name 'Kanimozhi Thevidiya', claimed that the High Court's judge chamber will "detonate shortly". It also claimed that an attempt would be made to "recreate" the 1998 Coimbatore blasts in Patna with the ISI cell.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Good decision but implementation is key. Hope security personnel are properly trained to handle this without harassing genuine visitors. The designated media zone is a practical solution.
M
Michael C
As someone who frequently visits courts, I appreciate this move. The selfie culture had gotten out of hand - people forgetting they're in a place of justice, not a tourist spot.
A
Anjali F
While security is important, I hope this doesn't become an excuse to restrict legitimate journalism. The media plays crucial role in keeping judiciary accountable. Balance is needed.
V
Vikram M
These bomb hoaxes are becoming too common. Strict punishment needed for those making false threats - they waste security resources and disrupt court functioning. 🚨
S
Sarah B
Hope other high courts follow suit. Security protocols need to be standardized across all Indian courts. The recent threats show we can't be complacent.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50