Suparn Verma on 'Haq': Why India's Women's Rights Impact the World

Director Suparn Verma's upcoming film 'Haq' tackles the landmark Shah Bano case that became a watershed moment for women's rights in India. The film explores how a 62-year-old Muslim woman's fight for maintenance sparked national debate and political intervention. Verma emphasizes that he approaches sensitive subjects from a place of passion rather than fear, believing open dialogue enriches society. He argues that women's rights struggles are universal and India's democratic decisions impact global conversations.

Key Points: Suparn Verma Haq Film Shah Bano Case Women Rights

  • Film inspired by landmark Shah Bano triple talaq maintenance case
  • Supreme Court initially ruled for women's rights across religions
  • Political pressure led to 1986 law nullifying the judgment
  • Director approaches sensitive subjects from passion, not fear
  • 'Haq' celebrates women's universal struggles against prejudice
  • Film aims to spark healthy dialogue on critical social issues
3 min read

Suparn Verma: What happens in India does impact everything around the world

Director Suparn Verma discusses his feminist film 'Haq' inspired by the landmark Shah Bano case and why women's rights in India impact global democracy.

"What happens in India does impact everything around the world as well - Suparn Verma"

Mumbai, Nov 5

Director-writer Suparn Verma, who is awaiting the release of his upcoming film 'Haq', has detailed the reason behind making the film.

The director spoke with IANS in the run up to the release of the film, and shared that the film deals with an important subject and a watershed moment in women's rights in India. Given India is the largest democracy, he said that whatever happens in India does have an impact across the world.

The film is inspired from the landmark case of Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum. Shah Bano, a 62-year-old Muslim woman, sought maintenance from her husband after being divorced through triple talaq. The Supreme Court ruled in her favor under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, stating that maintenance applies to all citizens irrespective of religion.

The verdict sparked outrage among conservative Muslim groups, who argued that it interfered with Muslim Personal Law. Facing political pressure, Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi's Congress (INC) government passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, effectively nullifying the judgment and restoring the community's personal law autonomy.

When asked if at any point during the making of the film, he felt the pressure considering the magnitude of the story, the director told IANS, "So, for me personally here is the thing,a lot of times I get asked that were you scared to take the subject up. I do not approach creating anything from a space of fear, it has to be a space of passion, of love, of time to do it. And curiosity, and then you deep dive into it".

He further mentioned, "In subjects like this which hold so much of importance in our everyday life, they are of national importance and as Yami said we are one of the biggest democracies in the world, one of the most important countries in the world and what happens in India does impact everything around the world as well and vis-a-vis and something as endemic as a woman's rights is very universal in nature".

He went on, "It is not like this is just unique to Indian women or women of a certain community, women across the world suffer the same prejudice, face the same struggles, the same biases and women are fighting them every single day in every role that they are in, professionally or personally. For me, 'Haq' is a celebration of a woman, it is a deeply feminist film, yes, it has a lot of male members but that I think is immaterial, you do not have to be visually impaired to make a film about visually impaired people either, I think you need to have empathy, that is something severely lacking in the world today and I come from a space that I want to take on matters heads on and topics of conversation which need to be talked about today which are of very important nature, putting them under the carpet is not going to solve things, let us tackle them, talk about them, converse about them in a healthy, nuanced, balanced fashion".

The director said if we have an open and nuanced dialogue about things which demand attention, we will end up being much richer as a nation, as an audience.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
I appreciate that he's approaching this with empathy rather than fear. The Shah Bano case still resonates today - it shows how political considerations often override women's rights. Looking forward to watching this film.
S
Sarah B
As someone who studied this case in law school, I'm glad it's getting mainstream attention. The director is right - what happens in India does impact global conversations about women's rights. More filmmakers should take up such important topics.
A
Arjun K
While I appreciate the intent, I hope the film presents a balanced view and doesn't become one-sided. The personal law debate is complex and needs nuanced handling. The Rajiv Gandhi government's decision had its own political context that shouldn't be oversimplified.
M
Meera T
So proud to see Indian filmmakers taking up such relevant subjects! Shah Bano's struggle was not just hers alone - it represented the fight of millions of Indian women for their basic rights. Hope this film sparks meaningful conversations. 💪
V
Vikram M
The director makes a valid point about India's global impact. When the world's largest democracy takes a stand on women's rights, it sets an example for other nations. Looking forward to seeing how this important chapter of our history is portrayed on screen.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50