Key Points

A federal appeals court has ruled President Trump's tariffs illegal under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Democrat Representative Gregory Meeks is urging House Speaker Mike Johnson to take up a resolution ending the tariffs immediately. Trump has defiantly stated all tariffs will remain in effect despite the court's ruling. The tariffs have particularly impacted India with 50% duties that reports suggest stem from Trump's personal frustration over India-Pakistan mediation.

Key Points: Meeks Urges Johnson to End Trump Tariffs After Court Ruling

  • Federal appeals court ruled Trump's tariffs illegal under IEEPA law
  • Constitution grants tariff power to Congress not president
  • Trump vows tariffs remain despite court's ruling
  • India faces 50% tariffs due to Trump's personal pique
3 min read

Must stop covering Trump's lawlessness: Democrat Representative pushes for resolution to end tariff after Appeals court ruling

Rep. Gregory Meeks pushes Speaker Johnson to end Trump's tariffs after federal appeals court declares them illegal, citing presidential overreach of congressional powers.

"Speaker Johnson must stop covering for Trump's lawlessness & put my resolutions on the floor to end the tariffs. - Gregory Meeks"

Washington, DC August 30

After a federal appeals court ruled President Donald Trump's tariffs "illegal," Democrat Representative Gregory Meeks urged Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House of Representatives, to take up his resolution to end tariffs.

Noting the court judgment that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not allow Trump to impose tariffs, Gregory Meeks said that Speaker Johnson must stop covering for "Trump's lawlessness."

"Both trial & appellate courts told Trump his tariffs are illegal, as I argued in amicus briefs with my colleagues. IEEPA's not a tariff statute. Speaker Johnson must stop covering for Trump's lawlessness & put my resolutions on the floor to end the tariffs." Gregory Meeks said.

https://x.com/HouseForeign/status/1961594329400476025

The statement comes after a federal appeals court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorise a president to impose tariffs like the ones Trump used the law for earlier this year, the Federal Circuit said in an unsigned opinion upholding a lower-court ruling against Trump's tariffs.

The judges noted that Trump's unprecedented tariffs are an overstep of his power because the ability to impose taxes, including tariffs, is "a core Congressional power" that the Constitution grants to the legislative branch, as per CNN.

Following the court's ruling, Donald Trump affirmed that all tariffs imposed on the countries will remain in effect, calling a recent ruling by a "highly Partisan Appeals Court" incorrect.

"ALL TARIFFS ARE STILL IN EFFECT! Today, a Highly Partisan Appeals Court incorrectly said that our Tariffs should be removed, but they know the United States of America will win in the end. If these Tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the Country. It would make us financially weak, and we have to be strong," Trump said.

On April 2, President Donald Trump announced a sweeping set of new tariffs targeting around 60 countries or trade blocs with significant trade deficits with the United States, marking the largest US tariff hike in almost 100 years. He called the occasion "Liberation Day".

India has also been on the receiving end, with 25 per cent tariffs imposed on its goods and another 25 per cent penalty for purchasing Russian crude oil, taking the total to a staggering 50 per cent.

Meanwhile, a recent report by American multinational investment bank and financial services company Jefferies stated that the steep 50 per cent tariffs imposed by the United States on Indian goods are largely a result of President Donald Trump's "personal pique" at not being allowed to mediate in the India-Pakistan conflict.

The report said the American president had reportedly hoped to intervene following the four-day military conflict between the two countries in May.

It stated "tariffs are primarily the consequence of the American president's "personal pique" that he was not allowed to play a role in seeking to end the long running acrimony between India and Pakistan".

India has consistently maintained that it does not accept third-party intervention in its conflicts with Pakistan.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
If the report is true that tariffs are due to personal pique over mediation, it's deeply concerning. Trade policies should be based on economic merit, not personal ego. India was right to refuse third-party intervention in our matters.
A
Aditya G
Constitutional separation of powers matters everywhere. The US courts are doing their job by checking executive overreach. This sets a good precedent for democratic institutions worldwide.
S
Sarah B
While I understand the legal arguments, the timing feels politically motivated. Both sides seem to be playing politics with trade policy. Ordinary businesses and consumers suffer in this tug-of-war.
K
Karthik V
India should continue diversifying its export markets and reducing dependency on any single country. This situation shows why we need stronger trade relationships with other regions too.
M
Michael C
The constitutional principle here is important - Congress makes tariff laws, not the President. This isn't about partisan politics but about maintaining the balance of power that the US Constitution establishes.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50