Punjab AAP Slams Modi Government: MGNREGA Replacement a "Well-Planned Deception"

The Punjab unit of the Aam Aadmi Party has strongly criticized the central government's move to replace MGNREGA. They call the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission Gramin Bill a "well-planned deception." AAP spokesperson Neel Garg warns it threatens the rights and livelihood security of rural laborers. The party argues the new legislation centralizes power and removes the grassroots employment guarantee.

Key Points: Punjab AAP Condemns VB-G RAM G Bill to Replace MGNREGA

  • AAP condemns the new bill as a deceptive step to dismantle the rural job guarantee scheme
  • Warns over 12 crore MGNREGA job card holders will be directly affected
  • Criticizes Clause 68 for not guaranteeing work during 60 agricultural days
  • Argues the policy centralizes power and disconnects employment from grassroots access
2 min read

It's a step to dilute MGNREGA: Punjab AAP on VB-G RAM G Bill

Punjab AAP calls the VB-G RAM G Bill a deceptive move to dismantle MGNREGA, warning it will weaken rights and livelihood security for over 12 crore rural workers.

"This is not merely a change of name... The real issue is that the Centre has effectively sounded the death knell for MGNREGA. - Neel Garg, AAP Spokesperson"

Chandigarh, Dec 16

Punjab Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on Tuesday condemned the Union government's step to dismantle the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and replace it with the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission Gramin (VB-G RAM G), calling it a “well-planned deception” aimed at weakening the rights, dignity, and livelihood security of rural labourers.

AAP spokesperson Neel Garg told the media here that the Modi government has consistently relied on "hollow slogans and political theatrics to mislead the public, while systematically eroding welfare guarantees meant for the poorest sections of society".

"This is not merely a change of name, nor is it about removing Mahatma Gandhi's name. The real issue is that the Centre has effectively sounded the death knell for MGNREGA and is trying to hide its anti-labourer agenda behind manufactured TV debates and distractions," he said.

Garg warned that more than 12 crore rural workers, who currently hold MGNREGA job cards, will be directly affected by this new Bill introduced in the Parliament. "While the government is claiming an increase in guaranteed workdays from 100 to 125 days, the fine print of the proposed legislation exposes a dangerous reality. Clause 68 of the new bill does not guarantee work, but it includes denial of work," he added.

"It states that during 60 days of the agricultural season, there is no obligation to provide employment. Who will decide whether a labourer got work in agriculture or whether his household survived during those 60 days?" the AAP leader questioned. Under MGNREGA, employment demand was assessed at the grassroots, with workers approaching the panchayat or sarpanch directly.

Garg questioned how rural labourers would now access employment. "Will a poor worker now have to approach the Prime Minister for work? Even reaching the sarpanch was difficult; this policy completely disconnects employment from the grassroots and centralises power in Delhi," he added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
I'm an economics student following this. While rebranding and increasing workdays sounds good on paper, the devil is in the details. Centralizing the process in Delhi could create massive delays and red tape for the actual workers who need immediate wages.
A
Arjun K
The AAP is right to raise this issue. MGNREGA had its problems with delays in payment, but at least the right to work was legally guaranteed. "Viksit Bharat" should mean strengthening existing schemes, not dismantling them with fancy new names. Jai Hind.
P
Priyanka N
My mother used to get work under MGNREGA. Approaching the panchayat was straightforward. If now everything has to go through some centralised portal in Delhi, how will illiterate workers manage? This seems like it's designed to fail the very people it claims to help.
K
Karthik V
I respectfully disagree with the AAP's alarmist tone. Every scheme needs reform. If the new bill increases workdays from 100 to 125, that's a 25% increase! We should wait for the full debate in Parliament before calling it "anti-labourer".
M
Meera T
The name "MGNREGA" carried the weight of Gandhiji's vision for rural self-reliance. Replacing it feels symbolic of moving away from that core idea. The focus should be on fixing implementation, not on renaming and centralizing control. 🇮🇳

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50